Skip to content

Conversation

@madhavanmalolan
Copy link
Contributor

@madhavanmalolan madhavanmalolan commented Aug 6, 2025

Description

Testing (ignore for documentation update)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Breaking change
  • Documentation update

Checklist:

Additional Notes:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added a new blog post discussing the challenges and implications of Proof of Personhood in digital identity.
  • Documentation
    • Enhanced the contributor guide in the README with step-by-step Git commands for non-technical users, including instructions for cloning, branching, and pushing blog posts.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 6, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
reclaim-blog ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Aug 6, 2025 3:42pm

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.


madhavanmalolan seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 6, 2025

Walkthrough

A new non-technical contributor's guide was added to the README.md, providing explicit Git workflow instructions. The guide clarifies repository setup, dependency installation, branch management, and pushing changes. Additionally, a new blog post discussing Proof of Personhood and digital identity challenges was introduced in the content/posts directory.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Contributor Guide Updates
README.md
Added a "non-technical contributor's guide to pushing blogs" section with step-by-step Git commands for setup and workflow. Updated commit and push instructions to include explicit Git commands for pushing branches to the repository.
New Blog Post
content/posts/data-flow copy.mdx
Introduced a new blog post analyzing Proof of Personhood, digital identity, and scarcity-based reputation mechanisms. The article reviews current PoP methods and proposes approaches for future-proofing digital identity systems.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Contributor
    participant GitHub Repo
    participant Dev Team

    Contributor->>GitHub Repo: Clone repository
    Contributor->>GitHub Repo: Pull latest main branch
    Contributor->>GitHub Repo: Create and switch to new branch
    Contributor->>GitHub Repo: Commit and push changes
    Contributor->>Dev Team: Notify for merge
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Suggested reviewers

  • Scratch-net

Poem

A bunny hops with nimble feet,
New guides and posts—a tasty treat!
With Git commands now crystal clear,
And PoP debates for all to hear.
From README tips to digital lore,
This change is something to adore!
🐇✨

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch pop2

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
README.md (2)

14-22: Add language identifiers for all shell examples & drop prompt symbols

Each fenced block in this section is missing a language tag (bash) and the $ prompts violate MD014. Apply the same pattern as above to the “Pull latest” and “Create a branch” snippets to keep lint clean and improve readability.


73-75: Lint: fix final push snippet

Same issue here—no language spec and stray $.

-```
-$ git push origin name_of_your_branch
-```
+```bash
+git push origin name_of_your_branch
+```
content/posts/data-flow copy.mdx (3)

17-21: Typos & punctuation

  • “apporaches” → “approaches”
  • Add the period after “etc.” to satisfy style rules.
-There are other apporaches too - that [uses your palm](https://www.humanity.org/), ...
+There are other approaches too – that [use your palm](https://www.humanity.org/), ...
 ...
-... like eating food, taking a cab etc.
+... like eating food, taking a cab, etc.

32-38: Grammar & compound-adjective fixes

  • Remove the article in “an impossible”
  • Hyphenate “user-generated”
  • Prefer “will” over “going to be” for certainty
  • Period after “etc.”
-I feel it is an impossible to verify if an activity is done by a human on any app.
+I feel it is impossible to verify whether an activity is done by a human on any app.

-...digital services of user generated activity.
+...digital services of user-generated activity.

-...it is going to be hard to tell what activity was created by a human...
+...it will be hard to tell which activity was created by a human...

-...creating videos etc might actually be an AI agent...
+...creating videos, etc., might actually be an AI agent...

52-56: Tone & formal wording

Minor style improvements for clarity and formality.

-...but sufficiently hard to discourage malicious webcrawlers and DDoS bots...
+...but sufficiently difficult to discourage malicious web-crawlers and DDoS bots...

-...could spin up a new account and continue till they get banned again.
+...could spin up a new account and continue until they get banned again.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cbc956f and 01a8fcc.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
  • content/posts/data-flow copy.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
README.md

8-8: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


9-9: Dollar signs used before commands without showing output

(MD014, commands-show-output)


10-10: Dollar signs used before commands without showing output

(MD014, commands-show-output)


11-11: Dollar signs used before commands without showing output

(MD014, commands-show-output)


14-14: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


15-15: Dollar signs used before commands without showing output

(MD014, commands-show-output)


16-16: Dollar signs used before commands without showing output

(MD014, commands-show-output)


19-19: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


20-20: Dollar signs used before commands without showing output

(MD014, commands-show-output)


73-73: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


74-74: Dollar signs used before commands without showing output

(MD014, commands-show-output)

🪛 LanguageTool
content/posts/data-flow copy.mdx

[uncategorized] ~33-~33: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...of of personhood on digital services of user generated activity. I feel it is an impossible t...

(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)


[style] ~36-~36: Use ‘will’ instead of ‘going to’ if the following action is certain.
Context: ...://huggingface.co/Qwen), it is clear it is going to be hard to tell what activity was creat...

(GOING_TO_WILL)


[style] ~36-~36: Try using a synonym here to add a more professional tone to your writing.
Context: ...co/Qwen), it is clear it is going to be hard to tell what activity was created by a ...

(BECOME_DIFFICULT)


[style] ~38-~38: In American English, abbreviations like “etc.” require a period.
Context: ...tivity - like tweeting, creating videos etc might actually be an AI agent using you...

(ETC_PERIOD)


[style] ~52-~52: To elevate your writing, try using a synonym here.
Context: .... It's not impossible, but sufficiently hard to discourage malicious webcrawlers and...

(HARD_TO)


[style] ~54-~54: Consider using the more formal “until”.
Context: ...ould spin up a new account and continue till they get banned again. Both of these ...

(TILL)


[style] ~72-~72: In American English, abbreviations like “etc.” require a period.
Context: ...ight block them too. Cloudflare, Google etc already do this. They share DDoS blockl...

(ETC_PERIOD)

Comment on lines +8 to +12
```
$ git@github.com:reclaimprotocol/blog.git
$ cd blog
$ npm install
```
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Incorrect Git clone command and missing fenced-block language spec

The command omits the clone verb and the block lacks a language hint, both of which break copy-paste UX and trigger MD040/MD014 lint errors.

-```
-$ git@github.com:reclaimprotocol/blog.git
-$ cd blog
-$ npm install
-```
+```bash
+git clone git@github.com:reclaimprotocol/blog.git
+cd blog
+npm install
+```
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

8-8: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


9-9: Dollar signs used before commands without showing output

(MD014, commands-show-output)


10-10: Dollar signs used before commands without showing output

(MD014, commands-show-output)


11-11: Dollar signs used before commands without showing output

(MD014, commands-show-output)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around lines 8 to 12, the git clone command is missing the 'clone'
verb and the fenced code block lacks a language specifier, causing markdown lint
errors and poor copy-paste experience. Fix this by adding 'clone' to the git
command and specifying 'bash' as the language for the fenced code block,
ensuring the block starts with ```bash and ends with ```.

@madhavanmalolan madhavanmalolan merged commit c85dd54 into main Aug 6, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants