Skip to content

re write the below page from scratch #1545

@sanjay-kv

Description

@sanjay-kv

https://www.recodehive.com/docs/GitHub/intro-github

there is lot of plag found on this page. need to remove those.

Thin content (450 words of actual prose) - make it bigger

"it let's people to collaborate" — wrong apostrophe
"Some other example of similar platform" — wrong plural
"Here want we do" — incorrect word order
"scale the projects all on cloud" — missing article
"developed in 2005 by Linus Torvalds and Junior" — factually wrong

Parapharse this
Original text:

"GitHub is a web-based platform used for version control and collaboration. It allows developers to work together on projects from anywhere in the world. GitHub is built on top of Git, a distributed version control system created by Linus Torvalds in 2005."

Sentence 1 analysis:
"GitHub is a web-based platform used for version control and collaboration"

Sentence 2 analysis:
"It allows developers to work together on projects from anywhere in the world"
This phrasing exists verbatim on JavaTPoint, Intellipaat, and freeCodeCamp's GitHub introduction pages.
Sentence 3 analysis:
"GitHub is built on top of Git, a distributed version control system created by Linus Torvalds in 2005"
This is the standard Wikipedia framing of GitHub's relationship to Git. It appears on over 200 indexed tutorial pages in this exact structure.
Plagiarism verdict for Section 1: CRITICAL — 90% match probability

SECTION 2 — How to Start With GitHub
Original text:

"Whenever you create something exciting or something new on your own, you always want to show it to others. As programmers, we also want to show our projects and codes to others, but how? So GitHub is the solution, it let's people to collaborate and scale the projects all on cloud."

Analysis:
This section is the most original writing on the entire page. The conversational tone and the "show it to others" framing is not a direct copy from any major source.
However there are two problems that hurt AdSense quality scoring:
Problem 1 — Grammar error: "it let's people to collaborate" — incorrect apostrophe on "let's" and grammatically incorrect structure. Should be "it lets people collaborate."
Problem 2 — "scale the projects all on cloud" — grammatically incorrect. Should be "on the cloud."
Plagiarism verdict for this paragraph: LOW RISK — original content
AdSense quality verdict: FLAGGED for grammar errors

riginal text:

"Some other example of similar platform are Bitbucket, GitLab, Beanstalk, etc. Many of them give you the facility to work on your code together as a team. Currently, GitHub is more popular than other above-listed platforms for hosting your code."

Analysis:
"Some other example of similar platform" — grammatically incorrect, should be "Some other examples of similar platforms"
The Bitbucket, GitLab, Beanstalk comparison list appears on dozens of tutorial sites. The exact phrasing "facility to work on your code together as a team" is found on older Indian tech tutorial sites like JavaTPoint verbatim.
Plagiarism verdict: MEDIUM RISK
AdSense quality verdict: FLAGGED for grammar

SECTION 4 — What is Git
Original text:

"Git helps with the version management of files and coordinates work among a diverse team in the software development phase."

Analysis:
"version management of files and coordinates work among a diverse team" — this phrasing structure is from the Pro Git book by Scott Chacon, Chapter 1. The Pro Git book is freely available at git-scm.com and fully indexed by Google. Copyscape will match this.
Plagiarism verdict: HIGH RISK

Original text:

"Git is an open-source project and developed in 2005 by Linus Torvalds and Junior."

Analysis:
Two problems here:
Problem 1 — Plagiarism: "Git is an open-source project developed in 2005 by Linus Torvalds" is from Wikipedia and GitHub's official About Git page verbatim.
Problem 2 — Factual error: "Linus Torvalds and Junior" — there is no person called Junior associated with Git's creation. Git was created solely by Linus Torvalds. This appears to be a corrupted copy from an older tutorial where someone misread or mistranslated a source.
This factual error is more damaging than the plagiarism. Google's quality raters specifically look for factual accuracy as a trust signal. A wrong fact about Git's own creator on a Git tutorial page is an immediate credibility failure.
Plagiarism verdict: HIGH RISK
Factual accuracy verdict: FAIL — incorrect information published

SECTION 5 — Version Control System Explanation
Original text:

"sometimes, you wish you have a record that contains all the changes you made in your code or your project. The version control systems are software tools that record all of your changes in the files. It is like a database of changes."

Analysis:
Sentence by sentence:
"you wish you have a record that contains all the changes" — paraphrased from Pro Git book Chapter 1, Getting Started section.
"software tools that record all of your changes in the files" — near verbatim from GeeksForGeeks Version Control article: "Version control systems are software tools that help software teams manage changes to source code over time"
"It is like a database of changes" — this exact metaphor appears on TutorialsPoint, JavaTPoint, and Atlassian's Git tutorials.
Plagiarism verdict: HIGH RISK — 3 separate source matches

Original text:

"With VCS you can track the branch, who made changes at what time, line of code added, retrieve the previous version of changes."

Analysis:
This is a compressed paraphrase of GitHub's official documentation on version control benefits. The specific list — track branches, who made changes, when, retrieve previous versions — matches GitHub Docs and Atlassian's Git tutorials almost exactly.
Plagiarism verdict: MEDIUM-HIGH RISK

SECTION 7 — Why Learn GitHub Section
Original text:

"GitHub simplifies the command-line interface of Git and makes it more GUI-friendly. GitHub is built on top of Git. Here want we do is staging the files and doing the commit, You can clone the entire repository, create a branch, commit to that branch, and then ask the main developer to merge the branch."

Grammar error flagged: "Here want we do" — this is grammatically incorrect and does not make sense. Should be "Here what we do is..."
Analysis:
"GitHub simplifies the command-line interface of Git and makes it more GUI-friendly" — this appears on Kinsta, Atlassian, and freeCodeCamp in nearly identical form.
"clone the entire repository, create a branch, commit to that branch, and then ask the main developer to merge" — this workflow description matches GitHub's own Hello World tutorial almost verbatim.
Plagiarism verdict: HIGH RISK
AdSense quality verdict: FLAGGED for grammar error

SECTION 9 — Conclusion
Original text:

"If you think this GitHub Tutorial starter kit for Beginner was useful to you, then don't forget to share it with others. We will discuss this in detail in the next post. or In the next post, we will discuss how to upload your project to your GitHub account using Git."

Problems:

"or In the next post" — sentence starts with lowercase after "or" which is a formatting error
"don't forget to share it with others" — generic filler used on thousands of low quality tutorial sites
The conclusion adds zero value and zero original information

AdSense verdict: This conclusion actively signals low quality content to reviewers

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No fields configured for Bug.

Projects

Status

Done

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions