-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 117
[bugfix] More robust completion check for the Torque scheduler #1279
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[bugfix] More robust completion check for the Torque scheduler #1279
Conversation
|
Hello @victorusu, Thank you for updating! Cheers! There are no PEP8 issues in this Pull Request!Do see the ReFrame Coding Style Guide Comment last updated at 2020-04-28 11:57:54 UTC |
47916f7 to
ba281b0
Compare
vkarak
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just have a minor formatting comment.
|
@jenkins-cscs retry daint |
…fix/torque_job_completion
vkarak
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CI is failing everywhere.
…fix/torque_job_completion
|
@victorusu There is only a PEP8 issue remaining for this. |
I added the code proposed by @ZQyou to the torque scheduler. @ZQyou can you please check if it works for you?
Fixes #1238