Skip to content

Conversation

@teojgo
Copy link
Contributor

@teojgo teojgo commented Jun 5, 2019

Fixes #816

@teojgo teojgo added this to the ReFrame sprint 2019w22 milestone Jun 5, 2019
@teojgo teojgo requested review from victorusu and vkarak June 5, 2019 08:17
@teojgo teojgo self-assigned this Jun 5, 2019
for key, ref in t.check.perfvalues.items():
var = key.split(':')[-1]
val = ref[0]
val = ref[1]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am wondering what has changed in the reference tuple?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change in pipeline.py is redundant. I suggest reverting it back without the tag. Then statistics will be fine again.

Copy link
Contributor

@vkarak vkarak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should add a basic unit test that will protect us from future regressions.

Copy link
Contributor

@victorusu victorusu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

for key, ref in t.check.perfvalues.items():
var = key.split(':')[-1]
val = ref[0]
val = ref[1]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change in pipeline.py is redundant. I suggest reverting it back without the tag. Then statistics will be fine again.

@vkarak
Copy link
Contributor

vkarak commented Jun 5, 2019

I am raising this issue's priority, cos this feature was supposed to be introduced in 2.18 and it is broken!

@vkarak
Copy link
Contributor

vkarak commented Jun 7, 2019

@jenkins-cscs retry daint

@vkarak
Copy link
Contributor

vkarak commented Jun 7, 2019

@jenkins-cscs retry none

@vkarak vkarak merged commit 6eb1b72 into reframe-hpc:master Jun 7, 2019
@teojgo teojgo deleted the bugfix/performance_report_numbers branch June 13, 2019 14:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Performance report does not print numbers

3 participants