Structural code analysis for LLMs, humans, and CI — no parsers, zero config.
pip install qualeRequirements: Python 3.9+, Git (for diff-based commands)
Optional: Configure MCP server for agent integration (see docs/MCP_SETUP.md)
First time using Quale? Follow this path:
-
Orient yourself in any repo:
cd your-repo quale oReturns: language breakdown, module map, landmark files, recommended workflow.
-
Review code quality before making changes:
quale review
Returns: structural risks, test gaps, hub-risk files, action items.
-
Get edit context before modifying a file:
quale ec --files src/auth.ts
Returns: risk level, verification candidates (test files), scope guard. The
verification_mc.candidatesfield tells you which tests to run. -
Verify after editing:
quale vp --files src/auth.ts
Returns: verification candidates with co-change signal.
For LLM agents: Use the short aliases (quale ec, quale vp, quale o) or configure the MCP server for typed function calls. See the LLM Agent section below.
For CI pipelines: Use quale ci check to enforce structural gates. See docs/CI_INTEGRATION.md.
pip install quale
cd my-project
quale ec --files src/route.ts # agent: edit context (75% accuracy)
quale o # agent: repo orientation
quale review # human: per-file review summary
quale ci check origin/main HEAD # CI: automated gatesQuale commands are available in three forms:
- Short aliases (recommended for agents):
quale ec,quale vp,quale o - Namespace commands:
quale core edit-context,quale agent orient - MCP tools:
edit_context,verify_packet,orient(when using MCP server)
All three forms call the same underlying engine. Short aliases are optimized for agent workflows where token efficiency matters.
Run this on any repo to see immediate value:
quale o # Get repo orientation (landmarks, modules, languages)
quale review # See structural risks and test gaps
quale ec --files <file> # Get edit context before modifying a fileThe quale ec command returns a verification_mc field with test file candidates.
This is what drives the 75% accuracy improvement over baseline.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Are you an LLM agent? │
│ YES → Use short aliases: quale ec, quale vp, quale o │
│ NO → Continue below │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ First time in this repo? │
│ YES → Run: quale o │
│ NO → Continue below │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ About to edit a file? │
│ YES → Run: quale ec --files <file> │
│ NO → Continue below │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Want to review code quality? │
│ YES → Run: quale review │
│ NO → Continue below │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Running in CI? │
│ YES → Run: quale ci check origin/main HEAD │
│ NO → Run: quale inspect (explore the codebase) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Quale catches structural issues that humans and LLMs miss:
Problem: You're editing src/auth.ts and need to know which tests to run.
Without Quale: You guess src/auth.test.ts or tests/auth.test.ts. Wrong 80% of the time.
With Quale:
quale ec --files src/auth.tsReturns: verification_mc.candidates: ["tests/unit/auth.test.ts", "tests/integration/auth-flow.test.ts"]
Result: 75% accuracy on test file prediction, 0.0 extra edits (no scope creep).
This works because Quale analyzes vocabulary co-occurrence across your entire codebase, not just file naming conventions.
Commands are organized into four personas — LLM agents are the primary design target (measured 75% accuracy, 0.0 extra edits):
| Persona | Prefix | Commands |
|---|---|---|
| LLM agent | quale |
o (orient), ec (edit-context, 75% accuracy), vp (verify-packet, 80% accuracy) |
| Human developer | quale |
review, onboard, refactor-cost, inspect, explore |
| CI pipeline | quale ci |
check, comment, trend, init (GitHub Actions generator) |
| Structural primitives | quale core |
60+ commands including hub-risk, spectral-gap, criticality |
Quale provides structural context that helps agents make better decisions about which files to edit and which tests to run.
Quick setup (choose one):
-
MCP Server (recommended for agents with MCP support):
// Add to your MCP config (claude_desktop_config.json, opencode.json, etc.) { "mcpServers": { "quale": { "command": "quale", "args": ["--mcp"] } } }
See docs/MCP_SETUP.md for detailed setup instructions.
-
Skill file (for OpenCode auto-invocation):
cp SKILL.md ~/.config/opencode/skills/quale.mdOpenCode will automatically invoke
quale ecbefore edits. -
Shell commands (works everywhere):
quale o # Orient: repo map + landmarks quale ec --files <file> # Edit context: risk + verification candidates quale vp --files <file> # Verify packet: co-change signal
What agents get:
verification_mc.candidates: Test files to run (75% accuracy, 0.0 extra edits)risk_level: HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW based on hub-risk and blast radiusstable_anchors: Files that rarely change (touch with caution)scope_creep_guard: Files outside the change scope
Measured results (1,100 trials across 12 repos):
- Baseline: 10-20% test accuracy, 0.40-0.65 extra edits
- With Quale: 75% test accuracy, 0.0 extra edits
See docs/EFFECT_HARNESS.md for full methodology.
| Command | What it does |
|---|---|
quale review |
Per-file review: stable anchors, hub risk, test gaps, action items |
quale onboard |
Onboarding plan: languages, macro-modules, landmark files |
quale refactor-cost <file> |
Effort estimate: direct impact, transitive ripple, clones |
quale inspect . |
Codebase overview: tech stack, module layout, health |
quale explore . |
Best files to read first for a new contributor |
| Command | What it does |
|---|---|
quale ci init |
Generates a GitHub Actions YAML |
quale ci check <base> <head> |
Runs structural gates, exits 0-7 with bitmask |
quale ci comment <base> <head> |
Posts structural report as GitHub PR comment |
quale ci trend |
Tracks CI metric trends over time |
See quale core --help for 60+ commands including hub-risk, spectral-gap,
criticality, coupling-chain, diff-structural, test-gaps, and more.
flowchart LR
A[Source files] --> B[Vocabulary extraction]
B --> C[Co-occurrence matrix]
C --> D[Structural analysis]
D --> E[Human output]
D --> F[CI gates]
D --> G[Agent JSON]
Quale reads every source file as text and builds a vocabulary for each one.
Words and identifiers are extracted by splitting on delimiters (., _, -,
/, CamelCase; no AST or parser needed). Stopwords, imports, and keywords
are stripped.
These per-file vocabularies are assembled into a sparse co-occurrence matrix:
if two files both contain the identifier createUser, they share an edge.
The matrix captures vocabulary overlap relationships: which files speak the
same "language" without parsing imports, ASTs, or data flow. This naturally
reveals module alignment, test coverage gaps, and files that act as vocabulary
hubs.
The same delimiter-splitting pipeline works without modification across languages. There is no grammar file, no AST plugin, no language-specific config. Quale treats every source file as text, so it handles any language the same way. The quality of the output depends on the codebase having enough identifiers to build a meaningful matrix.
| Metric | What it measures | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Hub risk | Files coupled to many others but rarely edited | Changes to these files break many dependents; they need careful review |
| Spectral gap | Size ratio of largest vs second-largest vocabulary cluster | A gap > 3x often points to a monolith: one module's vocabulary dominates the repo |
| Test mirror | Structural overlap between source and test files | Low overlap suggests tests don't exercise the source vocabulary directly |
| Criticality (k) | Change amplification factor | k > 1 means changes cascade: touching one file affects many through shared vocabulary |
| Entropy | Directory-level vocabulary dispersion | High-entropy directories use identifiers inconsistently across files |
| Coupling chain | N-hop transitive file coupling | The indirect blast radius: changing A may break C through B |
| Stable core | Files whose vocabulary is stable across git history | Low-risk refactoring targets |
| Clone detection | Near-identical identifier sets across files | Candidates for deduplication |
flowchart LR
A[Co-occurrence matrix] --> B[Hub risk]
A --> C[Spectral gap]
A --> D[Test mirror ratio]
A --> E[Criticality k]
A --> F[Coupling chains]
B --> G["quale review / agent guard"]
C --> G
D --> G
E --> G
F --> G
G --> H[Terminal report or structured JSON]
What it is:
- A structural vocabulary analyzer for codebases
- A code review tool that surfaces coupling, test gaps, and stable anchors
- A CI gate that checks for structural regressions
- An LLM agent helper that provides repo context in structured JSON
What it's not:
- Not a linter (no AST, no rule engine, no style checking)
- Not a test coverage tool (vocabulary overlap ≠ statement coverage)
- Not a security scanner (no data flow, no taint analysis)
- Not a dependency graph (import paths are never parsed; co-occurrence is inferred from identifier sharing, which is different)
- Not useful on a brand-new repo with fewer than ~50 files (there's no structure to measure)
- Not a replacement for human code review (it catches structural blind spots, not logic bugs)
githistory required for diff-based commands- 75% verification accuracy on test-file prediction. The remaining 25% are repos without stem-matched tests or co-change history. When quale can't find the right file, it says so rather than guessing.
git clone https://github.com/Reliary/quale
cd quale
pip install -e ".[dev]"
python -m pytest tests/ -v
ruff check quale/
mypy quale/ --ignore-missing-imports- docs/MCP_SETUP.md - MCP server setup for agents
- docs/ALGORITHM.md - vocabulary extraction and co-occurrence data flow
- docs/COMMANDS.md - full command reference
- docs/CI_INTEGRATION.md - CI setup guide
- docs/EFFECT_HARNESS.md - methodology and results
- CHANGELOG.md - release history
MIT