@remotion/studio-protocol: Update website wording - #10030
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
samohovets
force-pushed
the
studio-protocol-license-key-docs
branch
from
July 31, 2026 14:34
462d4a6 to
f60ec6e
Compare
samohovets
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 31, 2026 14:57
![pullfrog[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1768019?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
✅ No new issues found.
Reviewed changes
- New
setLicenseKeyInStudio()docs page — follows the same structure asinstallInStudio()with twoslash example, arguments, return value, target selection, supported origins, and compatibility sections. - Overview and security page updates — reframes the protocol from "bringing content into Studio" to "connecting websites to Studio", adds the new API to the summary, and documents the stricter trusted-origin boundary for license key operations.
- Sidebar, TOC, and article registration — new page wired into all three registries in the correct positions.
- Package metadata —
package.jsondescription and keywords updated,README.mdupdated to match.
DeepSeek Pro (free via Pullfrog for OSS) (Claude Opus not used — the program covers this model; add its provider key to run your pick) ｜ 𝕏
samohovets
force-pushed
the
studio-protocol-license-key-docs
branch
from
July 31, 2026 15:09
f60ec6e to
0e482c0
Compare
samohovets
force-pushed
the
studio-protocol-license-key-docs
branch
from
July 31, 2026 15:32
0e482c0 to
b459d4d
Compare
samohovets
force-pushed
the
studio-protocol-license-key-docs
branch
from
July 31, 2026 16:31
b459d4d to
387567d
Compare
samohovets
changed the title
@remotion/studio-protocol: Document license key method@remotion/studio-protocol: Update website wording
samohovets
force-pushed
the
studio-protocol-license-key-docs
branch
from
July 31, 2026 16:32
387567d to
c1fad9d
Compare
samohovets
force-pushed
the
studio-protocol-license-key-docs
branch
from
August 1, 2026 09:23
c1fad9d to
abd9d60
Compare
JonnyBurger
force-pushed
the
studio-protocol-license-key-docs
branch
from
August 2, 2026 08:16
abd9d60 to
34089ba
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR is stacked on #10029.
Preview
Testing
cd packages/docs && bun run lintbun run buildbun run stylecheck