Skip to content

ci: add placeholder required status gate#1

Merged
WomB0ComB0 merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
feat/ci-governance-adoption
Apr 17, 2026
Merged

ci: add placeholder required status gate#1
WomB0ComB0 merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
feat/ci-governance-adoption

Conversation

@WomB0ComB0
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Adds .github/workflows/required.yml — a placeholder that emits a green required status-check context matched by org ruleset default-branch-baseline (id 15191038, evaluate mode).

Before flipping the ruleset to active, either add needs: on real C++ CI jobs or replace with a reusable-workflow call once resq-software/.github ships cpp-ci.yml (deferred from ArduPilot#12).

Related: resq-software/.github#12.

Satisfies the `required` status-check context in org ruleset
`default-branch-baseline` (id 15191038, evaluate mode).

Placeholder: always passes. Before the ruleset flips to active,
harden with `needs:` on real C++ CI jobs or swap for a call to
resq-software/.github cpp-ci.yml (deferred).
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Note

Gemini is unable to generate a review for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 17, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@WomB0ComB0 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 52 minutes and 53 seconds before requesting another review.

Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 52 minutes and 53 seconds.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: a3c444e6-c09f-4137-9b46-b9e20c24cf4d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e36b001 and 7965f61.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS
  • .github/workflows/required.yml
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/ci-governance-adoption

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

WomB0ComB0 added a commit to resq-software/.github that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2026
…l dispatch

Adds the two deferred reusable workflows:

- dotnet-ci.yml: restore, build, format check, test. Configurable
  dotnet-version (default 9.0.x), solution path, working-directory.
- cpp-ci.yml: CMake configure + build + test matrix across
  ubuntu/macos/windows (configurable). Harden-runner on Linux only
  (step-security action is Linux-native).

Extends required.yml to dispatch the two new languages, and adds
proto handling (security-only, no language build dispatched). New
inputs: dotnet-version, dotnet-solution, cpp-os-list, cpp-source-dir,
cpp-cmake-flags.

After this lands, these placeholder consumer PRs can be hardened to
call real CI:
- resq-software/dotnet-sdk#36 (dotnet)
- resq-software/viz#4 (dotnet)
- resq-software/vcpkg#6 (cpp)
- resq-software/ardupilot#1 (cpp)
Required before the org ruleset 'default-branch-baseline' flips
from evaluate to active; otherwise require_code_owner_review has
no owner to match and would block every PR.
@WomB0ComB0 WomB0ComB0 merged commit 96a38f8 into master Apr 17, 2026
189 of 190 checks passed
@WomB0ComB0 WomB0ComB0 deleted the feat/ci-governance-adoption branch April 17, 2026 10:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant