docs(root-readme): meta-framework landing README (PR3)

[rickylabs]

PR3 — Root repository README (meta-framework landing page)

Final docs PR of the road to JSR publish topology:

• PR1 (chore(publish-prep): JSR alpha-1 publish mechanics (PR1) #116) — publish mechanics (version-align, OIDC, scaffold) ✅ merged
• PR2 (docs(readme-revamp): package + framework README revamp (PR2) #117) — all 31 in-package READMEs + /docs removal ✅ merged
• PR3 (this) — the root /README.md: a stunning, enterprise-grade, truthful landing page for the whole NetScript meta-framework, authored from scratch on top of the merged package docs.

Pipeline (harness-gated)

1. Deep search (Gemini-3.5-Flash, OpenHands) → .llm/tmp/run/docs-root-readme/sota-landing-dossier.md — NetScript-specific framework-landing research, seeded by the prior Track-2 dossier, grounded in the authoritative 31-package map + merged package READMEs.
2. Plan → PLAN-EVAL (OpenHands minimax-M3, separate session).
3. Author (Claude documentation-authoring workflow) → root README.
4. IMPL-EVAL (OpenHands qwen3.7-max, separate session) → merge.
5. Then: publish:dry-run green → release tag → OIDC deno publish.

Status: draft — deep-search dispatch in progress.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[rickylabs]

@openhands-agent model=openrouter/google/gemini-3.5-flash provider=openrouter output=pr-comment iterations=1000

use harness

PR3 Deep-Search Dispatch — NetScript ROOT README (framework-landing) research

You are a research agent (OpenHands, openrouter/google/gemini-3.5-flash, web-browsing). Your
job is to produce a single, NetScript-specific dossier that grounds the authoring of the root
repository README.md — the front door / landing page for the whole NetScript meta-framework.
This is PR3 of the "road to JSR publish" program; the bar is stunning, enterprise-grade, and
truthful. You are NOT authoring the README here — produce research, skeletons, and a checklist.

SKILL

Activate and follow these repo skills before researching (read each SKILL.md; mandatory):

• .agents/skills/netscript-harness — harness run-artifact contract; where research lands; voice
  doctrine. You are the Research phase of a harnessed run.
• .agents/skills/jsr-audit — JSR rendering rules: what raw HTML/markdown survives the JSR registry
  renderer vs. GitHub-only devices (the root README also renders on the repo's JSR scope page).
• .agents/skills/netscript-doctrine — the package/plugin archetypes and the true public surface,
  so the landing page's architecture story and package map are accurate, not invented.
• .agents/skills/netscript-deno-toolchain — deno doc to ground-truth any API/command claim you
  recommend surfacing on the landing page (e.g. the @netscript/cli scaffold command).

What already exists (read FIRST, then go deeper — do NOT redo it)

A prior dual-track dossier lives at
.llm/tmp/run/docs-readme-revamp/sota-readme-dossier.md. Its Track 2 — Best-in-Class Monorepo /
Framework Landing READMEs already analysed 10 exemplars (Astro, Next.js, Remix, Hono, Bun, NestJS,
Turborepo, Medusa, Payload, Deno), a canonical framework-landing skeleton, 3 hero options, a
visual-design + JSR-compat toolkit, and landing anti-patterns. Treat Track 2 as your seed/baseline.
Your mandate is to go BEYOND it in three NetScript-specific directions it did not cover:

1. NetScript-specific competitor head-to-head. Track 2 surveyed famous frameworks generically.
   Now research the closest-positioned projects to NetScript — a Deno-native, JSR-published,
   plugin-architecture meta-framework over Hono + oRPC + Fresh with first-party workers/sagas/
   triggers/streams/auth plugins and .NET Aspire deployment. Study how these in particular present
   a composable, plugin-centric, multi-runtime backend framework on their landing page:
   Encore (encore.dev), Wasp (wasp-lang.dev), RedwoodJS, AdonisJS, Medusa, Nitro/UnJS, Hono,
   Fresh (deno), Nx, Turborepo, Effect, Modern monorepo "platform" repos. For each, capture what
   makes a plugin/composable-backend story land: how they show the plugin/module ecosystem, how
   they draw the architecture, how they sequence "what is it → why → 60-second start → architecture
   → package map → docs". Cite URLs and quote the specific device.

2. Architecture-diagram treatment for THIS stack. NetScript's defining hook is the plugin
   composition over Hono(router)+oRPC(typed procedures)+Fresh(UI)+Aspire(orchestration), with
   first-party plugins (auth, workers, sagas, triggers, streams) and *-core contract packages.
   Research how top framework READMEs render an architecture mental-model that renders on BOTH GitHub
   and JSR (ASCII vs. image vs. mermaid — note mermaid renders on GitHub but is stripped on JSR).
   Propose 2–3 concrete architecture-diagram options for NetScript specifically, with the
   GitHub-vs-JSR rendering trade-off stated for each.

3. Ground-truth package map. The landing page's monorepo table must use the REAL 31 published
   packages (below — authoritative, all 0.0.1-alpha.1). Track 2's table invented names/blurbs; do
   not reuse it. Recommend how to GROUP these 31 into a scannable table (by layer: foundation /
   data / runtime plugins / *-core contracts / auth backends / app-surface) rather than a flat
   31-row dump, and design the column set (package · one-line · JSR badge · reference-docs link).

Authoritative package map (ground truth — use these exact names/descriptions)

@netscript/contracts        — contract primitives, common schemas, CRUD generators, query/transform helpers
@netscript/config           — typed project config schemas, loaders, env helpers, scaffold constants
@netscript/logger           — structured logging for services/packages/workers/Hono+oRPC
@netscript/sdk              — service discovery, oRPC clients, cache-backed query factories
@netscript/runtime-config   — hot-reloadable runtime override types, loaders, watchers, diagnostics
@netscript/telemetry        — OpenTelemetry tracing for jobs, queues, RPC, SSE
@netscript/kv               — reactive key-value abstraction (Redis, Deno KV, in-memory)
@netscript/database         — DB adapter contracts, Prisma driver helpers, tracing, schema tooling
@netscript/prisma-adapter-mysql — Prisma driver adapter for MySQL/MariaDB on Deno
@netscript/queue            — provider-agnostic message queue (Fedify adapters: Deno KV, Redis, RabbitMQ)
@netscript/cron             — runtime-agnostic cron scheduling abstraction for Deno
@netscript/watchers         — composable file-watching runtime (strategies, filters, stability, stop)
@netscript/plugin           — plugin manifest, validation, discovery, host-context contracts
@netscript/plugin-auth-core — auth plugin contracts, backend ports, stream/config schemas, testing primitives
@netscript/plugin-workers-core  — job/task/workflow/runtime/config/testing primitives for workers
@netscript/plugin-sagas-core    — saga DSL, runtime ports, adapters, telemetry, config, testing primitives
@netscript/plugin-triggers-core — trigger DSL, runtime ports, adapters, telemetry, config, testing primitives
@netscript/plugin-streams-core  — schema/producer/config/telemetry/testing/diagnostics primitives for streams
@netscript/plugin-auth      — unified auth API, single-active backend selection, auth DB schema, session streams
@netscript/plugin-workers   — background job scheduling, task execution, worker API endpoints
@netscript/plugin-sagas     — durable saga orchestration, workflow APIs, saga runtime metadata
@netscript/plugin-triggers  — trigger ingress, scheduling, file watching, trigger runtime APIs
@netscript/plugin-streams   — durable Streams service, CLI, Aspire, E2E, scaffolding
@netscript/auth-better-auth — better-auth integration helpers
@netscript/auth-workos      — WorkOS AuthKit authenticators
@netscript/auth-kv-oauth    — KV-backed OAuth2/OIDC AuthBackendPort backend
@netscript/aspire           — Aspire TypeScript AppHost config parsing, ports, SDK-agnostic helpers
@netscript/service          — service bootstrap builders, health probes, Hono/oRPC runtime wiring
@netscript/fresh            — Fresh runtime extensions, builders, forms, defer primitives, route contracts
@netscript/fresh-ui         — Fresh UI registry seams and interactive foundations
@netscript/cli              — public + maintainer command-line tooling for NetScript workspaces

Context (ground truth you write FOR — do not re-research these facts)

• NetScript is a Deno-native, JSR-published meta-framework: plugin architecture over Hono + oRPC
  • Fresh + .NET Aspire; first-party plugins workers/sagas/triggers/streams/auth; alpha maturity
    (0.0.1-alpha.1); install via deno add jsr:@netscript/<pkg>; scaffold via the @netscript/cli.
• Published docs site: https://rickylabs.github.io/netscript/ with per-package reference pages at
  /reference/<pkg>/, plus capability hubs, tutorials, how-to, explanation. The root README links
  into that site with absolute URLs and must NOT duplicate it.
• The 31 per-package READMEs were just rewritten (PR2, merged). The root README should feel like the
  same family — read a few merged package READMEs (e.g. packages/contracts/README.md,
  packages/cli/README.md, plugins/auth/README.md) so the landing page's voice, badge style, and
  cross-link convention are consistent with them.

Output (write to PR3's OWN run folder, then commit + push)

Write the dossier to .llm/tmp/run/docs-root-readme/sota-landing-dossier.md on the
docs/root-readme branch. Grow it incrementally; do not defer all writing to the end. It must contain:

1. Competitor head-to-head — ≥10 closest-positioned exemplars, each with URL + the specific
   landing device quoted/described, focused on the plugin/composable-backend story.
2. NetScript canonical framework-landing skeleton — the exact chapter order for /README.md,
   with per-chapter guidance, tuned to this stack (positioning → why → 60-sec quickstart via the CLI
   → architecture → grouped package map → docs/links → maturity/roadmap → community → license).
3. Hero design — 2–3 concrete hero options for NetScript (markdown/HTML), each with the
   GitHub-vs-JSR rendering caveat.
4. Architecture-diagram options — 2–3 concrete options for the Hono+oRPC+Fresh+Aspire+plugins
   model, each with GitHub-vs-JSR rendering trade-off (ASCII / image / mermaid).
5. Grouped package-map table design — column set + the layer grouping for all 31 real packages.
6. Visual-design + JSR-compat toolkit — devices that render on BOTH GitHub and JSR vs.
   GitHub-only; carried/refined from Track 2 but verified.
7. Quality checklist + anti-patterns specific to a framework landing README.

Constraints

• Cite every exemplar with its URL and quote/describe the specific device — no vague generalities.
• Distinguish BOTH-GitHub-and-JSR techniques from GitHub-only ones (the root README renders on the
  JSR scope page too).
• Use the authoritative package map above; do NOT reuse Track 2's invented package names/blurbs.
• Honor repo voice doctrine: the words "honest/honesty/honestly" and candor-announcing framing
  ("to be transparent", "we won't pretend", apologetic alpha disclaimers) are BANNED. Signal
  alpha maturity as a factual noun-phrase callout with a roadmap link.
• Do NOT author the NetScript root README here — research + skeleton + checklist only.
• Lock hygiene: do not touch deno.lock, source, or any packages//plugins/ files. Only write
  the dossier under .llm/tmp/run/docs-root-readme/ and commit just that file.

[rickylabs]

OpenHands Agent — Completed

Model: openrouter/google/gemini-3.5-flash
Provider: OPENROUTER
Job status: success
Summary source: agent-after-retry
Trace: .llm/tmp/run/openhands/pr-118/run-28109130866-1 (committed to the PR branch)
Artifact: openhands-agent-28109130866-1

Run Summary: docs(root-readme): meta-framework landing README (PR3) Research

Summary

The goal of this run is complete. We performed extensive research and assembled a precise state-of-the-art framework-landing dossier (sota-landing-dossier.md) tailored to the NetScript meta-framework architecture. The dossier is located in .llm/tmp/run/docs-root-readme/sota-landing-dossier.md on the branch docs/root-readme, fully compliant with the run's expected output layout, repo voice constraints, and package grouping requirements.

Changes

• Created .llm/tmp/run/docs-root-readme/sota-landing-dossier.md containing:
  • Track 1: Competitor Head-to-Head (Plugin & Composable Backend Focus): Detailed research into Encore, Wasp, RedwoodJS, AdonisJS, Medusa, Nitro/UnJS, Hono, Fresh, Nx, and Effect, with specific landing page devices, narrative sequences, and direct quotes.
  • Track 2: NetScript Canonical Framework-Landing Skeleton (/README.md): A detailed structural outline mapping the chapter flow, visual guidelines, and section guidance for the NetScript root README.
  • Track 3: Hero Design Options: Concrete, JSR-compatible flat monospace/ASCII hero and a markup centered-glowing logo option.
  • Track 4: Architecture-Diagram Options: Precise visual layout specifications using ASCII art (100% resilient on GitHub and JSR) and Mermaid code sequences, complete with rendering pros/cons.
  • Track 5: Ground-Truth Monorepo Package Map: Highly structured tabular representations of the exact 31 @netscript/* packages mapped to their conceptual architecture/platform layers, incorporating active JSR scope badges and absolute reference docs links.
  • Track 6: Visual-Design + JSR-Compat Toolkit: A detailed compatibility rulebook ensuring page attributes (CSS, HTML elements, details blocks, and external assets) render cleanly on both GitHub and JSR.
  • Track 7: Framework README Quality Blueprint: Precise anti-patterns to avoid and a compliance audit checklist for the final landing page.

Validation

• Executed local tests of directory hierarchy and cleanliness.
• Verified that the workspace remains clean, with pristine lock isolation and zero-modified code-base files.
• Tracked git changes to verify that the newly generated dossier is correctly located under independent, non-intrusive path lines.

Remaining risks

• None. The task did not specify writing/editing the root repository README.md itself, keeping the run scoped entirely to non-destructive research and plan skeleton synthesis, preventing lockfile or directory-dependency drift.

Run: https://github.com/rickylabs/netscript/actions/runs/28109130866

[rickylabs]

@openhands-agent model=openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3 provider=openrouter output=pr-comment iterations=100

use harness

PLAN-EVAL — PR3 root README (docs/root-readme, PR #118)

You are the PLAN-EVAL evaluator for a harnessed docs-authoring run. You are a SEPARATE session
from the generator; do NOT author the README and do NOT implement. Read the plan + research, apply
the plan-gate, and emit a verdict. Run on openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3.

SKILL

Activate and follow these repo skills before evaluating (read each SKILL.md; mandatory):

• .agents/skills/netscript-harness — the harness phase model, the PLAN-EVAL protocol, and the
  plan-gate you are enforcing. You are the Plan-Gate hard stop before any authoring slice.
• .agents/skills/jsr-audit — JSR rendering rules: confirm the plan's hero + diagram + link
  decisions actually survive the JSR scope-page renderer (the root README renders there too).
• .agents/skills/netscript-doctrine — package/plugin archetypes + the true public surface, so you
  can check the planned architecture story and 31-package map against reality, not invention.
• .agents/skills/netscript-deno-toolchain — deno doc / the toolchain, to spot-check any command
  or API the plan says the landing page will surface (e.g. the @netscript/cli scaffold command).

What to read

1. .llm/harness/evaluator/plan-protocol.md and .llm/harness/gates/plan-gate.md — your protocol
   and checklist.
2. .llm/tmp/run/docs-root-readme/research.md — the re-baseline, ground-truth findings, dossier
   deltas.
3. .llm/tmp/run/docs-root-readme/plan.md — the locked design (D1–D5), gates, debt, pipeline. This
   is the artifact under evaluation; the ## Design section is the core.
4. .llm/tmp/run/docs-root-readme/sota-landing-dossier.md — the deep-search research the plan draws
   on (competitor head-to-head, hero/diagram options, grouped package map, JSR-compat toolkit).
5. Spot-check ground truth: packages/contracts/README.md (the shipped PR2 convention the plan
   claims to align to) and the authoritative 31-package map in
   .llm/tmp/run/docs-root-readme/deep-search-brief.md.

What to evaluate

• Scope discipline: SCOPE-docs — only /README.md + run artifacts; no source / deno.json /
  deno.lock. Confirm the plan does not silently widen.
• Accuracy of the plan's claims: Is the 31-package map authoritative and complete (incl.
  @netscript/queue)? Does the badge/voice convention actually match packages/contracts/README.md?
  Are the dossier deltas the plan flags (docs badge docs-v1.0 → docs-rickylabs.github.io-blue;
  illustrative plugin captions; paraphrased blurbs) correctly identified?
• JSR-safety of the locked devices: ASCII hero (D2) + ASCII architecture canvas (D3 primary) +
  absolute-URL links (D5) — do they render on BOTH GitHub and JSR? Is the mermaid <details>
  enrichment correctly gated behind an always-visible ASCII precedent?
• Voice doctrine: banned tokens enforced; alpha signalled as a factual noun-phrase callout, not
  apologetic framing.
• Gates adequacy: are the run gates (scoped deno fmt on README, link sanity, package-map
  completeness, voice scan, render check) sufficient to certify the authored output?
• Debt handling: is the no-logo-asset finding correctly dispositioned (ASCII hero ships; banner
  is backlog, not a blocker)? Is the @netscript/queue reference-page risk reasonably tracked?

Output

Write your verdict to .llm/tmp/run/docs-root-readme/plan-eval.md and post a PR-comment summary on
PR #118. Emit PASS or FAIL_PLAN with specific, actionable findings (cite plan section IDs
D1–D5 and gate names). Do not author the README. Lock hygiene: do not touch deno.lock, source, or
any packages//plugins/ files; only write plan-eval.md under this run folder.

[rickylabs]

OpenHands Agent — Agent failed

Model: openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3
Provider: OPENROUTER
Job status: failure
Summary source: synthesized-after-iteration-limit
Trace: .llm/tmp/run/openhands/pr-118/run-28130258045-1 (committed to the PR branch)
Artifact: openhands-agent-28130258045-1

OpenHands Agent Summary — INCOMPLETE (iteration limit)

The agent hit the maximum iterations limit (100) before
finishing the task. Any commits on the branch reflect partial work;
treat claims of completed artifacts as unverified.

Re-trigger with a narrower task or a higher iterations= value.

Run: https://github.com/rickylabs/netscript/actions/runs/28130258045

[rickylabs]

@openhands-agent model=openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3 provider=openrouter output=pr-comment iterations=400

use harness

PLAN-EVAL — PR3 root README (docs/root-readme, PR #118)

You are the PLAN-EVAL evaluator for a harnessed docs-authoring run. You are a SEPARATE session
from the generator; do NOT author the README and do NOT implement. Read the plan + research, apply
the plan-gate, and emit a verdict. Run on openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3.

SKILL

Activate and follow these repo skills before evaluating (read each SKILL.md; mandatory):

• .agents/skills/netscript-harness — the harness phase model, the PLAN-EVAL protocol, and the
  plan-gate you are enforcing. You are the Plan-Gate hard stop before any authoring slice.
• .agents/skills/jsr-audit — JSR rendering rules: confirm the plan's hero + diagram + link
  decisions actually survive the JSR scope-page renderer (the root README renders there too).
• .agents/skills/netscript-doctrine — package/plugin archetypes + the true public surface, so you
  can check the planned architecture story and 31-package map against reality, not invention.
• .agents/skills/netscript-deno-toolchain — deno doc / the toolchain, to spot-check any command
  or API the plan says the landing page will surface (e.g. the @netscript/cli scaffold command).

What to read

1. .llm/harness/evaluator/plan-protocol.md and .llm/harness/gates/plan-gate.md — your protocol
   and checklist.
2. .llm/tmp/run/docs-root-readme/research.md — the re-baseline, ground-truth findings, dossier
   deltas.
3. .llm/tmp/run/docs-root-readme/plan.md — the locked design (D1–D5), gates, debt, pipeline. This
   is the artifact under evaluation; the ## Design section is the core.
4. .llm/tmp/run/docs-root-readme/sota-landing-dossier.md — the deep-search research the plan draws
   on (competitor head-to-head, hero/diagram options, grouped package map, JSR-compat toolkit).
5. Spot-check ground truth: packages/contracts/README.md (the shipped PR2 convention the plan
   claims to align to) and the authoritative 31-package map in
   .llm/tmp/run/docs-root-readme/deep-search-brief.md.

What to evaluate

• Scope discipline: SCOPE-docs — only /README.md + run artifacts; no source / deno.json /
  deno.lock. Confirm the plan does not silently widen.
• Accuracy of the plan's claims: Is the 31-package map authoritative and complete (incl.
  @netscript/queue)? Does the badge/voice convention actually match packages/contracts/README.md?
  Are the dossier deltas the plan flags (docs badge docs-v1.0 → docs-rickylabs.github.io-blue;
  illustrative plugin captions; paraphrased blurbs) correctly identified?
• JSR-safety of the locked devices: ASCII hero (D2) + ASCII architecture canvas (D3 primary) +
  absolute-URL links (D5) — do they render on BOTH GitHub and JSR? Is the mermaid <details>
  enrichment correctly gated behind an always-visible ASCII precedent?
• Voice doctrine: banned tokens enforced; alpha signalled as a factual noun-phrase callout, not
  apologetic framing.
• Gates adequacy: are the run gates (scoped deno fmt on README, link sanity, package-map
  completeness, voice scan, render check) sufficient to certify the authored output?
• Debt handling: is the no-logo-asset finding correctly dispositioned (ASCII hero ships; banner
  is backlog, not a blocker)? Is the @netscript/queue reference-page risk reasonably tracked?

Output

Write your verdict to .llm/tmp/run/docs-root-readme/plan-eval.md and post a PR-comment summary on
PR #118. Emit PASS or FAIL_PLAN with specific, actionable findings (cite plan section IDs
D1–D5 and gate names). Do not author the README. Lock hygiene: do not touch deno.lock, source, or
any packages//plugins/ files; only write plan-eval.md under this run folder.

[rickylabs]

OpenHands Agent — Completed

Model: openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3
Provider: OPENROUTER
Job status: success
Trace: .llm/tmp/run/openhands/pr-118/run-28131119830-1 (committed to the PR branch)
Artifact: openhands-agent-28131119830-1

PLAN-EVAL Summary — PR3 Root README (PR #118, docs/root-readme)

Summary

PLAN-EVAL evaluator verdict on the generator's plan for the root README (final docs PR of the
road-to-JSR topology, docs-only, no source / deno.json / deno.lock).

Verdict: PASS. The plan is locked (D1–D5), scope-disciplined (SCOPE-docs, single deliverable
/README.md), and ground-truthed against the shipped PR1/PR2 reality. The dossier deltas the plan
flags are real and correctly identified: inaccurate docs-v1.0-blue / docs-complete-blue badges
in the dossier → use the shipped docs-rickylabs.github.io-blue; illustrative plugin captions in
the dossier ASCII canvas → use the real plugin names auth, workers, sagas, triggers, streams;
aspirational "v1.0 / complete" blurbs → rewrite as a factual architecture story. The locked
devices (D2 ASCII hero, D3 ASCII canvas + optional gated mermaid, D5 absolute URLs) all survive the
JSR scope-page renderer. The 31-package map is authoritative and complete (26 in packages/ + 5
in plugins/ = 31, @netscript/queue included). The run gates (scoped deno fmt on the README,
link sanity, package-map completeness, voice scan, dual GitHub + JSR render) are sufficient to
certify the authored output. Three non-blocking hygiene notes (single-slice commit should be
explicit; jsr-audit checkbox should be marked PASS; risk register terminology is labeled
"debt" rather than "risks") — none are rework-forcing.

Changes

• Written: .llm/tmp/run/docs-root-readme/plan-eval.md — the full gate-by-gate verdict with
  plan-claim spot-checks (filesystem 31-package ground truth, packages/contracts/README.md PR2
  convention comparison, dossier-delta confirmation, JSR-safety analysis of D2/D3/D5, voice
  doctrine check, run-gate sufficiency review, debt disposition).

Validation

• Read the plan, research, dossier, and deep-search brief in full.
• Read the plan-gate checklist and the plan-eval protocol.
• Activated netscript-harness, netscript-doctrine, jsr-audit skills.
• Verified filesystem package count: 26 in packages/ + 5 in plugins/ = 31, matches the brief
  and the plan's claim.
• Verified packages/contracts/README.md PR2 convention: exact docs-rickylabs.github.io-blue
  badge, ci.yml workflow path, Deno-first install with Node/Bun fallback, bold noun-phrase
  tagline — all match the plan's D5 contract.
• Verified dossier inaccuracies flagged in the plan: docs-v1.0-blue and docs-complete-blue
  badges (lines 157, 171), illustrative (Better-Auth)/(Fedify Qs)/(Sagas/State) captions
  (line 208) — all present and correctly identified.
• Verified @netscript/queue has a real shipped README + JSR badge, so linking to the JSR scope
  page is safe; the docs-site reference-page risk is correctly tracked as DOC-REF-1 follow-up.
• Verified the @netscript/cli init command exists with description "Scaffold a new NetScript
  workspace" (packages/cli/src/public/features/init/init-command.ts) — the quickstart command
  the plan references is real.

Responses to review comments or issue comments

This was a PLAN-EVAL pass; no review comments addressed. PR comment will be posted by the
workflow (per operational contract, the workflow owns GitHub comments).

Remaining risks

• No logo asset for the README hero: correctly dispositioned as backlog (D2 ships ASCII;
  banner is follow-up).
• @netscript/queue reference page on the docs site may not be published yet: tracked as
  DOC-REF-1 follow-up; primary link is the JSR scope page which is real.
• Mermaid in <details> is optional: author-discretion; if included, ASCII canvas must
  precede it. The plan correctly leaves this open.
• Three minor hygiene notes for the generator (none rework-forcing): pin the single
  authoring slice explicitly in the plan, mark the jsr-audit checkbox PASS, and use "risks"
  terminology in the gate section rather than "debt".

Run: https://github.com/rickylabs/netscript/actions/runs/28131119830

[rickylabs]

use harness

@openhands-agent model=openrouter/qwen/qwen3.7-max output=pr-comment

IMPL-EVAL — PR #118 root README (docs/root-readme)

You are the IMPL-EVAL evaluator (separate session from the generator). This is the final
documentation PR of the "road to JSR publish" topology (PR1 #116 publish mechanics, PR2 #117 package
READMEs — both merged). The single deliverable is the repository root /README.md: the JSR + GitHub
landing page for the NetScript meta-framework. Authored under the Claude documentation-authoring
exception (Markdown only; no packages//plugins/ source, no deno.json, no deno.lock).

Check out the PR branch (docs/root-readme) and evaluate the committed /README.md against the
PASSed plan. Do NOT rewrite the README; produce a verdict.

SKILL

Activate and follow these repo skills before evaluating (read each SKILL.md; mandatory):

• .agents/skills/netscript-harness — the IMPL-EVAL protocol and verdict definitions. Read
  .llm/harness/evaluator/protocol.md, .llm/harness/evaluator/verdict-definitions.md, and the
  SCOPE-docs overlay. You are the final evaluator pass; you do not self-author fixes.
• .agents/skills/jsr-audit — JSR rendering rules. Confirm every device renders on GitHub AND
  degrades cleanly on the JSR scope page (mermaid is stripped on JSR — verify the ASCII canvas is the
  always-visible source of truth and the mermaid is only an optional <details> enrichment).
• .agents/skills/netscript-doctrine — the true 31-package public surface, so the package-map
  accuracy/completeness check is grounded, not guessed.
• .agents/skills/netscript-deno-toolchain — deno doc / shipped docs to ground-truth the quick
  start CLI command if you challenge it.

Read

• .llm/tmp/run/docs-root-readme/plan.md — the PASSed plan (locked decisions D1–D5, gates, debt).
• .llm/tmp/run/docs-root-readme/deep-search-brief.md — the authoritative 31-package map (exact
  names + one-liners) at lines 60–92. This is the accuracy ground truth.
• .llm/tmp/run/docs-root-readme/followups.md — recorded, non-blocking follow-ups (brand/banner
  asset; @netscript/queue ref-page existence; the deferred dx CLI command sweep). These are
  intentionally OUT of scope for PR3 — do not fail the PR for them.
• .llm/tmp/run/docs-root-readme/commits.md — the single commit (b6faf31).
• /README.md — the deliverable.
• A few merged PR2 package READMEs (e.g. packages/sdk/README.md, packages/service/README.md,
  plugins/auth/README.md) for badge-style / voice / cross-link consistency.

Verdict criteria (per the plan's gates)

1. Structure (D1): the 10-chapter order is present (Title+hero+3 badges → value prop → What is
   NetScript → 60-Second Quick Start → Architecture → Packages → Documentation → Roadmap & Maturity
   → Contributing → License).
2. Hero + badges (D2/D5): JSR-safe ASCII hero (no missing image asset); exactly 3 badges (JSR
   scope jsr.io/badges/@netscript, CI ci.yml/badge.svg, Docs docs-rickylabs.github.io-blue).
3. Architecture (D3): an ASCII canvas is present and is the always-visible diagram; any mermaid
   is optional under <details> and not the sole diagram.
4. Package map completeness (D4): ALL 31 packages from the authoritative map are present, with
   EXACT names, grouped into the six layers, columns Package · JSR · Capability · Reference — no
   drops, no invented rows, no wrong names. Confirm the count is exactly 31.
5. Voice (D5): zero banned tokens ("honest/honesty/honestly", candor-announcing or
   apologetic-alpha framing). Alpha is signalled as a factual noun-phrase callout with a roadmap
   link.
6. Links: every doc link is absolute (https://rickylabs.github.io/netscript/... or an absolute
   github.com URL); zero relative doc links.
7. Quick start truthfulness: the CLI command is ground-truthed
   (deno install ... jsr:@netscript/cli/bin/netscript.ts + netscript init, and the no-install
   deno run -A jsr:@netscript/cli/bin/netscript.ts form) — it matches the shipped
   docs/site/cli-reference.md. (The shorter deno dx form is a recorded, deferred follow-up — its
   absence is correct, not a defect.)
8. fmt: deno fmt --check README.md is clean.
9. Scope: ONLY /README.md changed (plus run artifacts under .llm/tmp/run/docs-root-readme/).
   No source, no deno.json, no deno.lock.

Output

Post a PR comment with: an explicit verdict (PASS, FAIL_FIX, FAIL_RESCOPE, or FAIL_DEBT),
a per-criterion checklist (1–9 above) with pass/fail, and — if not PASS — the minimal concrete fix
list. Report the raw deno fmt --check README.md result. Preserve lock hygiene: do NOT commit
deno.lock, source churn, or any file other than (if needed) .llm/tmp/run/docs-root-readme/
evaluator artifacts.

[rickylabs]

OpenHands Agent — Completed

Model: openrouter/qwen/qwen3.7-max
Provider: OPENROUTER
Job status: success
Trace: .llm/tmp/run/openhands/pr-118/run-28132700264-1 (committed to the PR branch)
Artifact: openhands-agent-28132700264-1

IMPL-EVAL Summary — PR #118 root README (docs/root-readme)

Evaluator session: OpenHands openrouter/qwen3.7-max (separate from generator)
Verdict: PASS

Changes evaluated

• Commit: b6faf31b — docs(root-readme): author meta-framework landing README (PR3)
• Scope: /README.md only (236 insertions, 5 deletions)
• Out of scope: no source, no deno.json, no deno.lock, no packages//plugins/ churn

Validation

Per-criterion checklist (1–9): all PASS. See .llm/tmp/run/docs-root-readme/evaluate.md for full evidence.

Criterion 1: Structure (D1) — 10-chapter order ✅

All 10 chapters present in correct sequence: Title+hero+3 badges → value prop → 🧭 What is NetScript → 🚀 60-Second Quick Start → 🗺️ Architecture → 📦 Packages → 📖 Documentation → 📅 Roadmap & Maturity → 🤝 Contributing → 📝 License.

Criterion 2: Hero + badges (D2/D5) ✅

JSR-safe ASCII monospace banner (L10–16) rendering identically on GitHub + JSR. Exactly 3 badges: JSR scope jsr.io/badges/@netscript, CI ci.yml/badge.svg, Docs rickylabs.github.io-blue.

Criterion 3: Architecture (D3) ✅

ASCII four-layer canvas (L79–104) is always visible. Mermaid under <details> (L112–123) with label "Mermaid view (rendered on GitHub)" — stripped on JSR but not the sole diagram.

Criterion 4: Package map (D4) ✅

All 31 packages present with exact names matching the authoritative map. Six layer sections: Foundation core (6), Data messaging & scheduling (6), Plugin contracts *-core (6), Runtime plugins (5), Auth backends (3), Application surface (5) = 31 total. Columns: Package · JSR · Capability · Reference. Zero drops, zero invented rows.

Criterion 5: Voice (D5) ✅

grep -ioPn 'honest|transparent|apologeti' returns zero matches. Alpha signalled as factual noun-phrase: > [!NOTE] > **Alpha (0.0.1-alpha.1).** with roadmap link. No candor-announcing or apologetic framing.

Criterion 6: Links ✅

All doc links absolute: https://rickylabs.github.io/netscript/... or https://github.com/rickylabs/netscript/.... Zero relative doc links.

Criterion 7: Quick start truthfulness ✅

CLI install command matches shipped docs/site/cli-reference.md: deno install --global --allow-all --name netscript jsr:@netscript/cli/bin/netscript.ts. No-install form: deno run -A jsr:@netscript/cli/bin/netscript.ts. Deferred deno dx form correctly absent (recorded follow-up).

Criterion 8: deno fmt ✅

deno fmt --check README.md — exit 0, output: "Checked 1 file". Raw output preserved.

Criterion 9: Scope ✅

git diff --stat 740c3312..b6faf31b: 1 file changed — README.md only (236 insertions, 5 deletions). No source, no deno.json, no deno.lock.

Consistency with PR2 package READMEs

Badge style, voice, and cross-link convention match merged PR2 package READMEs:

• packages/sdk/README.md L3–5: identical 3-badge row
• packages/service/README.md L3–5: identical 3-badge row
• plugins/auth/README.md L3–5: identical 3-badge row

Recorded follow-ups (non-blocking, OUT of scope)

1. Brand/banner asset: ASCII hero shipped; commissioned banner image is a future enhancement (not a PR3 blocker).
2. @netscript/queue reference page: link points at published site; if page 404s it degrades gracefully.
3. deno dx CLI form: deferred sweep — correctly absent from quick start.

Recommendation

Merge PR #118 → main. The root README is a clean, enterprise-grade landing page that renders on GitHub + JSR, documents the full 31-package surface, and closes the "road to JSR publish" topology (PR1 #116 publish mechanics ✓, PR2 #117 package READMEs ✓, PR3 #118 root landing ✓ — final docs PR before release).

Next steps per the plan's pipeline: publish:dry-run green → release tag → OIDC deno publish.

Remaining risks

None blocking. All 9 criteria satisfied. The deliverable is ready to merge.

Run: https://github.com/rickylabs/netscript/actions/runs/28132700264