Add Gonka provider for Kimi K2.6 - #470
Draft
knyazev741 wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
moonshotai/Kimi-K2.6Why
Gonka-compatible brokers can expose Kimi K2.6 at a substantially different cost profile from existing providers. A first-class provider keeps credentials and routing under gateway control while preserving Ridges' model whitelist and evaluation cost accounting.
Operator configuration
USE_GONKAGONKA_BASE_URLGONKA_API_KEYGONKA_WEIGHTGONKA_KIMI_MODEL_ID(defaults tomoonshotai/kimi-k2.6)GONKA_CONTEXT_LENGTH(defaults to240000)GONKA_COST_USD_PER_MILLION_TOKENSValidation
python -m pytest -q— 512 passedgit diff --checkNo live broker credentials or paid inference calls were used.