Bump missing dependency

[PawelPeczek-Roboflow]

What does this PR do?

Bumping missing docs dependency.

Type of Change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)

Testing

• ci
• I have tested this change locally
• I have added/updated tests for this change

Test details:

Checklist

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code where necessary, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• My changes generate no new warnings or errors
• I have updated the documentation accordingly (if applicable)

Additional Context

[github-actions]

👋 Thanks for the pull request! Here is how automated Claude review works here, so you spend credits (and reviewer time) wisely.

🚦 This PR is marked Ready for review, so automated Claude review will run — and every pass spends real credits.

Warning

💸 The Claude reviewer bills in credits, not vibes

Automated review spins up a real agent that reads real code and spends real credits on every pass. It is glad to help — but it is not a rubber duck, a linter you poke in a loop, or a substitute for reading the contributing guide. Treat it like an expensive senior reviewer whose time you booked, and show up prepared.

Draft when unsure, Ready when you mean it:

• 🌱 Not sure the PR is in good shape yet? Keep it (or set it back) as a draft — drafts pause review, so you can push and iterate without burning credits on a moving target.
• 💪 Feel strong about the contents? Mark it Ready for review and the reviewer will take a look.

However you get there, arrive prepared:

• 🧱 Bring a SOLID, thorough PR. Point your local agent at our skills/ to tune it to our guidelines first — or, if you are one of those fabled carbon-based contributors, read them yourself. A half-baked diff costs exactly the same to review as a finished one.
• ✅ Resolve every comment before you re-request review. Re-requesting with threads still open means paying twice for the same conversation.
• 🔁 Do not use CI review as an inner loop for a local agent. The reviewer is not a step-by-step debugger — do the unfolding locally and arrive with the answer, not the search.
• 🙋 If something looks off, ask a human. One question to a maintainer is cheaper and faster than three rounds of agent re-review chasing a misread.

Reviews are not free. A draft costs nothing to review; a Ready PR is a promise that it is worth reviewing.

• Prefer to skip automated review entirely? Add the skip-claude-review label.

[github-actions]

🤖 Claude review started at commit bb24f0f2d2575d783d4c765d9a9799cf4600d6ba.

New commits are not auto-reviewed. Add the claude-review label to request a re-review — the label is consumed when the review starts, so just add it again next time.

[github-actions]

Skills: review-packaging-ci

Reviewed the sole change — a patch bump of mistune 3.3.0 → 3.3.3 in requirements/requirements.docs.txt. This is a docs-build-only dependency (used only by .github/workflows/docs.yml), not shipped in any wheel or Docker image and not part of the inference-models or Execution Engine versioned subsystems, so no changelog entry is required. Docs-build breakage from the bump would surface in the gated docs CI. No blocking findings, no clarification questions.

Reviewed at HEAD: bb24f0f

[github-actions]

😎 PR passes the vibe-check and trust-me-bro verification.