v0.2.0
What's new in 0.2.0
A substantial sharpening of the review procedure for both commands.
/deep-review:review
- Two-axis triage. Every issue is now scored on confidence (0-100, is it real?) and severity (critical/major/minor, does it matter?), and tiered from both - so a high-confidence typo no longer outranks a probable data-loss bug.
- Verification pass. Impactful-but-uncertain issues (critical/major, confidence < 60) now get a dedicated agent that resolves them: confirm and promote, refute and drop, or flag with a "verify: " note - instead of being silently demoted.
- Better scoring. The scorer receives the actual diff hunk and CLAUDE.md contents, so it verifies rather than guesses.
- Dedup before scoring and reviewer agents scaled to PR size.
- Presentation. Output leads with a verdict and per-tier counts; the posted comment uses a summary table with lower tiers in collapsible sections, and an inline confidence prefix per issue.
/deep-review:auto
- Double-checks every issue against the real code before fixing; fixes only what it can confirm, skips the rest with a recorded reason.
- Same size scaling and table-based summary comment.
Both
- Shared canonical reference (
reference/review-shared.md) for the reviewer roster, rubrics, false-positive list, link format, and output style, so the two commands stay in sync. - The trailer is now conditional and dropped on public repos.
Full changelog: v0.1.1...v0.2.0