Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
10 changes: 5 additions & 5 deletions rclcpp/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
This document is a declaration of software quality for the `rclcpp` package, based on the guidelines in [REP-2004](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2004.html).
This document is a declaration of software quality for the `rclcpp` package, based on the guidelines in [REP-2004](https://reps.openrobotics.org/rep-2004/).

# rclcpp Quality Declaration

The package `rclcpp` claims to be in the **Quality Level 1** category when it is used with a **Quality Level 1** middleware.

Below are the rationales, notes, and caveats for this claim, organized by each requirement listed in the [Package Requirements for Quality Level 1 in REP-2004](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2004.html).
Below are the rationales, notes, and caveats for this claim, organized by each requirement listed in the [Package Requirements for Quality Level 1 in REP-2004](https://reps.openrobotics.org/rep-2004/).

## Version Policy [1]

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ All pull requests will be peer-reviewed, check [ROS 2 Developer Guide](https://d

### Continuous Integration [2.iv]

All pull requests must pass CI on all [tier 1 platforms](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2000.html#support-tiers)
All pull requests must pass CI on all [tier 1 platforms](https://reps.openrobotics.org/rep-2000/#support-tiers)

Currently nightly results can be seen here:

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ It is **Quality Level 1**, see its [Quality Declaration document](https://github

## Platform Support [6]

`rclcpp` supports all of the tier 1 platforms as described in [REP-2000](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2000.html#support-tiers), and tests each change against all of them.
`rclcpp` supports all of the tier 1 platforms as described in [REP-2000](https://reps.openrobotics.org/rep-2000/#support-tiers), and tests each change against all of them.

Currently nightly build status can be seen here:
* [linux-aarch64_release](https://ci.ros2.org/view/nightly/job/nightly_linux-aarch64_release/lastBuild/rclcpp/)
Expand All @@ -225,4 +225,4 @@ Currently nightly build status can be seen here:

### Vulnerability Disclosure Policy [7.i]

This package conforms to the Vulnerability Disclosure Policy in [REP-2006](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2006.html).
This package conforms to the Vulnerability Disclosure Policy in [REP-2006](https://reps.openrobotics.org/rep-2006/).
10 changes: 5 additions & 5 deletions rclcpp_action/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
This document is a declaration of software quality for the `rclcpp_action` package, based on the guidelines in [REP-2004](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2004.html).
This document is a declaration of software quality for the `rclcpp_action` package, based on the guidelines in [REP-2004](https://reps.openrobotics.org/rep-2004/).

# rclcpp_action Quality Declaration

The package `rclcpp_action` claims to be in the **Quality Level 1** category when it is used with a **Quality Level 1** middleware.

Below are the rationales, notes, and caveats for this claim, organized by each requirement listed in the [Package Requirements for Quality Level 1 in REP-2004](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2004.html).
Below are the rationales, notes, and caveats for this claim, organized by each requirement listed in the [Package Requirements for Quality Level 1 in REP-2004](https://reps.openrobotics.org/rep-2004/).

## Version Policy [1]

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ All pull requests will be peer-reviewed, check [ROS 2 Developer Guide](https://d

### Continuous Integration [2.iv]

All pull requests must pass CI on all [tier 1 platforms](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2000.html#support-tiers)
All pull requests must pass CI on all [tier 1 platforms](https://reps.openrobotics.org/rep-2000/#support-tiers)

Currently nightly results can be seen here:

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ It is **Quality Level 1**, see its [Quality Declaration document](https://github

## Platform Support [6]

`rclcpp_action` supports all of the tier 1 platforms as described in [REP-2000](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2000.html#support-tiers), and tests each change against all of them.
`rclcpp_action` supports all of the tier 1 platforms as described in [REP-2000](https://reps.openrobotics.org/rep-2000/#support-tiers), and tests each change against all of them.

Currently nightly build status can be seen here:
* [linux-aarch64_release](https://ci.ros2.org/view/nightly/job/nightly_linux-aarch64_release/lastBuild/rclcpp_action/)
Expand All @@ -191,4 +191,4 @@ Currently nightly build status can be seen here:

### Vulnerability Disclosure Policy [7.i]

This package conforms to the Vulnerability Disclosure Policy in [REP-2006](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2006.html).
This package conforms to the Vulnerability Disclosure Policy in [REP-2006](https://reps.openrobotics.org/rep-2006/).
10 changes: 5 additions & 5 deletions rclcpp_components/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
This document is a declaration of software quality for the `rclcpp_components` package, based on the guidelines in [REP-2004](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2004.html).
This document is a declaration of software quality for the `rclcpp_components` package, based on the guidelines in [REP-2004](https://reps.openrobotics.org/rep-2004/).

# rclcpp_components Quality Declaration

The package `rclcpp_components` claims to be in the **Quality Level 1** category.

Below are the rationales, notes, and caveats for this claim, organized by each requirement listed in the [Package Requirements for Quality Level 1 in REP-2004](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2004.html).
Below are the rationales, notes, and caveats for this claim, organized by each requirement listed in the [Package Requirements for Quality Level 1 in REP-2004](https://reps.openrobotics.org/rep-2004/).

## Version Policy [1]

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ All pull requests will be peer-reviewed, check [ROS 2 Developer Guide](https://d

### Continuous Integration [2.iv]

All pull requests must pass CI on all [tier 1 platforms](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2000.html#support-tiers)
All pull requests must pass CI on all [tier 1 platforms](https://reps.openrobotics.org/rep-2000/#support-tiers)

Currently nightly results can be seen here:

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ It is **Quality Level 1**, see its [Quality Declaration document](https://github

## Platform Support [6]

`rclcpp_components` supports all of the tier 1 platforms as described in [REP-2000](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2000.html#support-tiers), and tests each change against all of them.
`rclcpp_components` supports all of the tier 1 platforms as described in [REP-2000](https://reps.openrobotics.org/rep-2000/#support-tiers), and tests each change against all of them.

Currently nightly build status can be seen here:
* [linux-aarch64_release](https://ci.ros2.org/view/nightly/job/nightly_linux-aarch64_release/lastBuild/rclcpp_components/)
Expand All @@ -203,4 +203,4 @@ Currently nightly build status can be seen here:

### Vulnerability Disclosure Policy [7.i]

This package conforms to the Vulnerability Disclosure Policy in [REP-2006](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2006.html).
This package conforms to the Vulnerability Disclosure Policy in [REP-2006](https://reps.openrobotics.org/rep-2006/).
10 changes: 5 additions & 5 deletions rclcpp_lifecycle/QUALITY_DECLARATION.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
This document is a declaration of software quality for the `rclcpp_lifecycle` package, based on the guidelines in [REP-2004](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2004.html).
This document is a declaration of software quality for the `rclcpp_lifecycle` package, based on the guidelines in [REP-2004](https://reps.openrobotics.org/rep-2004/).

# rclcpp_lifecycle Quality Declaration

The package `rclcpp_lifecycle` claims to be in the **Quality Level 1** category when used with a **Quality Level 1** middleware.

Below are the rationales, notes, and caveats for this claim, organized by each requirement listed in the [Package Requirements for Quality Level 1 in REP-2004](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2004.html).
Below are the rationales, notes, and caveats for this claim, organized by each requirement listed in the [Package Requirements for Quality Level 1 in REP-2004](https://reps.openrobotics.org/rep-2004/).

## Version Policy [1]

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ All pull requests will be peer-reviewed, check [ROS 2 Developer Guide](https://d

### Continuous Integration [2.iv]

All pull requests must pass CI on all [tier 1 platforms](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2000.html#support-tiers)
All pull requests must pass CI on all [tier 1 platforms](https://reps.openrobotics.org/rep-2000/#support-tiers)

Currently nightly results can be seen here:

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ It is **Quality Level 1**, see its [Quality Declaration document](https://github

## Platform Support [6]

`rclcpp_lifecycle` supports all of the tier 1 platforms as described in [REP-2000](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2000.html#support-tiers), and tests each change against all of them.
`rclcpp_lifecycle` supports all of the tier 1 platforms as described in [REP-2000](https://reps.openrobotics.org/rep-2000/#support-tiers), and tests each change against all of them.

Currently nightly build status can be seen here:
* [linux-aarch64_release](https://ci.ros2.org/view/nightly/job/nightly_linux-aarch64_release/lastBuild/rclcpp_lifecycle/)
Expand All @@ -203,4 +203,4 @@ Currently nightly build status can be seen here:

### Vulnerability Disclosure Policy [7.i]

This package conforms to the Vulnerability Disclosure Policy in [REP-2006](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2006.html).
This package conforms to the Vulnerability Disclosure Policy in [REP-2006](https://reps.openrobotics.org/rep-2006/).