Skip to content

Conversation

@no-reply
Copy link
Member

@no-reply no-reply commented Feb 1, 2016

A few subject calls crept in where mutable or dataset should have
been called instead. These references work fine where no parameters are
required by the Repository, but don't test the object given by the
caller and break for, e.g., SPARQL::Client::Repository.

A few `subject` calls crept in where `mutable` or `dataset` should have
been called instead. These references work fine where no parameters are
required by the `Repository`, but don't test the object given by the
caller and break for, e.g., `SPARQL::Client::Repository`.
@no-reply
Copy link
Member Author

no-reply commented Feb 1, 2016

This fixes the problem described in ruby-rdf/rdf#190 (comment)

However, it looks like we have a dependency problem between the gems.

no-reply pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2016
Fix errant `subject` calls in Repository specs
@no-reply no-reply merged commit eb2ffc7 into develop Feb 2, 2016
@no-reply no-reply deleted the feature/subject-to-named branch February 2, 2016 00:18
@gkellogg
Copy link
Member

gkellogg commented Feb 2, 2016

Thanks! I'm working through dependency issues now, relaxing everything to >= 1.99 < 3 so we can advance the version numbers to 2.0.0.beta1. What a pain!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants