Avoid quadratic value-expression check on and/or chains - #4221
Merged
Earlopain merged 1 commit intoSep 5, 2026
Conversation
pm_check_value_expression descended the left operand of every and/or node it visited. Because pm_and_node_create and pm_or_node_create already assert the value of their left operand when the node is built, walking a left-associative chain such as `a && a && ... && a` re-checked the whole left spine once per operator, which is quadratic in the length of the chain: 16k operators took seconds. The left operand of an existing and/or node was therefore already checked, so stop at the node instead of descending. This makes the check linear. The only observable change is that a void value on the left spine of a chain is now reported once, at the innermost node where it is created, rather than once per enclosing operator; the errors fixture that pinned the duplicate is updated to match.
makenowjust
commented
Sep 5, 2026
| @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ | |||
| t next&&do end&= | |||
| ^~ unexpected 'do'; expected an expression after the operator | |||
| ^~~~ unexpected void value expression | |||
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
parse.y still reports this duplicated warning, but it is redundant; I'll open a pull request to fix it for parse.y too.
Earlopain
approved these changes
Sep 5, 2026
Earlopain
left a comment
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice, thanks.
BTW, you can do Prism.profile to get a more accurate number for just the parse step.
matzbot
pushed a commit
to ruby/ruby
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 5, 2026
(ruby/prism#4221) Ref https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/22294 pm_check_value_expression descended the left operand of every and/or node it visited. Because pm_and_node_create and pm_or_node_create already assert the value of their left operand when the node is built, walking a left-associative chain such as `a && a && ... && a` re-checked the whole left spine once per operator, which is quadratic in the length of the chain: 16k operators took seconds. The left operand of an existing and/or node was therefore already checked, so stop at the node instead of descending. This makes the check linear. The only observable change is that a void value on the left spine of a chain is now reported once, at the innermost node where it is created, rather than once per enclosing operator; the errors fixture that pinned the duplicate is updated to match. ruby/prism@b19a0a5bc0
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ref https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/22294
pm_check_value_expression()descends the left operand of every and/or node.Because
pm_and_node_createandpm_or_node_createalready assert the value of their left operand when the node is built, walking a left-associative chain such asa && a && ... && are-checks the whole left spine once per operator, which is quadratic in the length of the chain.The left operand of an existing and/or node was therefore already checked, so stop at the node instead of descending.
This makes the check linear.
The only observable change is that a void value on the left branch of a chain is now reported once, at the innermost node where it is created, rather than once per enclosing operator; the errors fixture that pinned the duplicate is updated to match.