Fix prev_sibling indexing off-by-one - #176
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The patch f06a2c9 changed the code to use skip instead of nth, which lead to an off-by-one bug that was uncovered by unit tests in ludtwig, see [1]. [1]: MalteJanz/ludtwig#122 Fixes: rust-analyzer#175
milianw
force-pushed
the
fix-prev_sibling
branch
from
November 22, 2024 14:59
9705fd6 to
84b1c8f
Compare
lnicola
approved these changes
Nov 22, 2024
Member
|
Ouch, thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The patch f06a2c9 changed the code to use skip instead of nth, which lead to an off-by-one bug that was uncovered by unit tests in ludtwig, see 1.
Fixes: #175