Add an alternative AHT20 driver #368
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
anglerud
requested review from
a team,
RandomInsano,
berkus and
rahul-thakoor
as code owners
|
r? @jamesmunns (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
S-waiting-on-review
eldruin
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2022
|
Build succeeded: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I wrote a new AHT20 driver and published a blog post about it. I created a new driver as the previous one took ownership of the delay device, denying it to other drivers and code. The existing AHT20 driver is also under the AGLP which is certainly a fine license, but not one I'd choose for a library myself.