Minor fixes to StdNonZeroNumberProvider for gdb #148540
Open
+6
−4
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
While looking at the pretty-printers, I found a few minor oddities in StdNonZeroNumberProvider. First, gdb.Type.fields() already returns a sequence, so there's no need to call list(). Second, it's more idiomatic for the (somewhat misnamed) to_string method to simply return the underlying gdb.Value. This also lets gdb apply whatever formats were passed to `print`, as the new test shows. Third, there's no need to use the field's name when looking up a field in a value, the gdb.Field itself can be used.
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum. Use |
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Zalathar
added a commit
to Zalathar/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2025
Minor fixes to StdNonZeroNumberProvider for gdb While looking at the pretty-printers, I found a few minor oddities in StdNonZeroNumberProvider. First, gdb.Type.fields() already returns a sequence, so there's no need to call list(). Second, it's more idiomatic for the (somewhat misnamed) to_string method to simply return the underlying gdb.Value. This also lets gdb apply whatever formats were passed to `print`, as the new test shows. Third, there's no need to use the field's name when looking up a field in a value, the gdb.Field itself can be used.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2025
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #145656 (Stabilize s390x `vector` target feature and `is_s390x_feature_detected!` macro) - #147043 (Add default sanitizers to TargetOptions) - #147803 (Add -Zannotate-moves for profiler visibility of move/copy operations (codegen)) - #147912 ([rustdoc] Gracefully handle error in case we cannot run the compiler in doctests) - #148540 (Minor fixes to StdNonZeroNumberProvider for gdb) - #148541 (Add num_children method to some gdb pretty-printers) - #148549 (Fix broken qemu-cskyv2 link) Failed merges: - #147586 (std-detect: improve detect macro docs) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Zalathar
added a commit
to Zalathar/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2025
Minor fixes to StdNonZeroNumberProvider for gdb While looking at the pretty-printers, I found a few minor oddities in StdNonZeroNumberProvider. First, gdb.Type.fields() already returns a sequence, so there's no need to call list(). Second, it's more idiomatic for the (somewhat misnamed) to_string method to simply return the underlying gdb.Value. This also lets gdb apply whatever formats were passed to `print`, as the new test shows. Third, there's no need to use the field's name when looking up a field in a value, the gdb.Field itself can be used.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2025
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #143037 (Make named asm_labels lint not trigger on hexagon register spans) - #147043 (Add default sanitizers to TargetOptions) - #147586 (std-detect: improve detect macro docs) - #147912 ([rustdoc] Gracefully handle error in case we cannot run the compiler in doctests) - #148540 (Minor fixes to StdNonZeroNumberProvider for gdb) - #148541 (Add num_children method to some gdb pretty-printers) - #148549 (Fix broken qemu-cskyv2 link) Failed merges: - #147935 (Add LLVM realtime sanitizer) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While looking at the pretty-printers, I found a few minor oddities in StdNonZeroNumberProvider.
First, gdb.Type.fields() already returns a sequence, so there's no need to call list().
Second, it's more idiomatic for the (somewhat misnamed) to_string method to simply return the underlying gdb.Value. This also lets gdb apply whatever formats were passed to
print, as the new test shows.Third, there's no need to use the field's name when looking up a field in a value, the gdb.Field itself can be used.