-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14k
std: allow Condvar to be used with multiple Mutexes
#148656
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
joboet
wants to merge
1
commit into
rust-lang:master
Choose a base branch
from
joboet:condvar_multiple_mutexes
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
+130
−61
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
|
rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum. Use |
Collaborator
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
I-libs-nominated
Nominated for discussion during a libs team meeting.
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The documentation for
Condvar::waitcurrently states thatThis is however only true on UNIX platforms that still use the pthread
Condvarimplementation (namely macOS, some BSDs like NetBSDs and some very niche platforms like VxWorks), making it likely that users will not be aware of this caveat.Hence in this PR, I've modified the pthread-based implementation to allow multi-mutex-use by adding an inner mutex that bridges the gap between the unlock operation on the user-specified mutex and the actual condvar wait.
Note that this closes the door on making the futex-based
notify_all()a requeuing operation, as the waiters might not be sharing the same mutex. At the same time, the implementation change here makes it easier to switch theMuteximplementation independent of theCondvarone, which would e.g. simplify switching it to employos_unfair_lockon macOS.@rustbot label +I-libs-nominated