Skip to content

Conversation

@scottmcm
Copy link
Member

@scottmcm scottmcm commented Nov 9, 2025

As discussed in rust-lang/rfcs#3721 (comment), update the try in nightly to match the RFC as a way to experiment.

This addresses the following unresolved issue from #31436

Address issues with type inference (try { expr? }? currently requires an explicit type annotation somewhere).

@rustbot rustbot added O-unix Operating system: Unix-like S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 9, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 9, 2025

r? @petrochenkov

rustbot has assigned @petrochenkov.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@scottmcm scottmcm force-pushed the experiment-new-try-block-v3 branch from 88085e3 to cfbecaf Compare November 9, 2025 05:03
@scottmcm scottmcm force-pushed the experiment-new-try-block-v3 branch from cfbecaf to 86c3ba7 Compare November 9, 2025 12:19
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 9, 2025

This PR was rebased onto a different master commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

O-unix Operating system: Unix-like S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants