thread::scope: document how join interacts with TLS destructors #149482
+7
−0
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #116237 by documenting the current behavior regarding thread-local destructors as intended. (I'm not stoked about this, but documenting it is better than leaving it unclear.)
This also adds documentation for explicit
joincalls (both for scoped and regular threads), saying that those will wait for TLS destructors. That reflects my understanding of the current implementation, which callsjoinon the native thread handle. Are we okay with guaranteeing that? I think we should, so people have at least some chance of implementing "wait for all destructors" manually. This fixes #127571.Cc @rust-lang/libs-api