rustdoc_missing_doc_code_examples: lint on macro_rules macros#154696
Open
lolbinarycat wants to merge 2 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
Open
rustdoc_missing_doc_code_examples: lint on macro_rules macros#154696lolbinarycat wants to merge 2 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
lolbinarycat wants to merge 2 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
Conversation
Collaborator
|
Some changes occurred in GUI tests. |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
lolbinarycat
changed the title
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
GuillaumeGomez
approved these changes
Apr 1, 2026
Member
|
Looks good to me, thanks! r=me once first PR is merged and this one passes CI. ;) |
lolbinarycat
force-pushed
the
rustdoc-missing_doc_code_examples-macro_rules
branch
from
34e07d5 to
6fd96dd
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
part of #154640
accidentally built this on top of #154644, but since that PR is already approved it should be fine if we just wait for it to be merged.
r? @GuillaumeGomez