Open
Conversation
Collaborator
|
Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_attr_parsing |
Collaborator
|
rustbot has assigned @jdonszelmann. Use Why was this reviewer chosen?The reviewer was selected based on:
|
Member
|
Should we consider a symbol name with only white spaces as empty? |
Contributor
Author
|
Hmm, I don't know that it's useful at all but it apparently does work https://godbolt.org/z/dMqhK6hbx " ":
.Lfunc_begin0:
.cfi_startproc
.file 1 "/app" "example.rs"
.loc 1 2 16 prologue_end |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixes #155495
Using an empty string as the name makes LLVM make up a name. However this name can be inconsistent between compilation units, which is UB and can cause linking errors, and some parts of LLVM just crash on the empty name (see the linked issue).
As far as we know there is only one valid pattern that could use this, a
#[used]static that is not referenced by the program at all. That is not UB, but theexport_nameis not required for that to work, just normal rust name mangling would do fine.Technically this is a breaking change, but it seems unlikely that this actually breaks code in the wild that wasn't already broken. I'll leave it up to T-lang to determine what is required here (crater run, FCW, ...), but my gut feeling is that we could just merge this and nobody would notice.