Rollup of 14 pull requests#155937
Closed
JonathanBrouwer wants to merge 73 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
Closed
Conversation
Following rust-lang#89117, rustc has defaulted to the v0 mangling scheme by default (since Nov 20th 2025). This surfaced two bugs: - rust-lang#138261 was a small ICE (found via fuzzing) where an implementation-internal namespace was missing for global assembly - this occurs with names instantiated within global assembly (that can happen inside constants) - rust-lang#134479 only occurs with unstable `generic_const_exprs` Since there have been three-to-four months for users to find bugs with this mangling scheme on nightly, that the scheme has been waiting many years to be stabilised, and has been used successfully internally at Microsoft, Meta and Google for many years, this patch proposes stabilising the v0 mangling scheme on stable. This patch does not propose removing the legacy mangling, it will remain usable on nightly as an escape-hatch if there are remaining bugs (though admittedly it would require switching to nightly for those on stable) - it is anticipated that this would be unlikely given current testing undergone by v0. Legacy mangling can be removed in another follow-up.
Add `bounds::FloatPrimitive` Exhaustive float pattern match Fix GCC use span bugs
This will become the default soon.
…tgross35,RalfJung Merge `fabsf16/32/64/128` into `fabs::<F>` Following [a small conversation on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Float.20intrinsics/with/521501401) (and because I'd be interested in starting to contribute on Rust), I thought I'd give a try at merging the float intrinsics :) This PR just merges `fabsf16`, `fabsf32`, `fabsf64`, `fabsf128`, as it felt like an easy first target. Notes: - I'm opening the PR for one intrinsic as it's probably easier if the shift is done one intrinsic at a time, but let me know if you'd rather I do several at a time to reduce the number of PRs. - Currently this PR increases LOCs, despite being an attempt at simplifying the intrinsics/compilers. I believe this increase is a one time thing as I had to define new functions and move some things around, and hopefully future PRs/commits will reduce overall LoCs - `fabsf32` and `fabsf64` are `#[rustc_intrinsic_const_stable_indirect]`, while `fabsf16` and `fabsf128` aren't; because `f32`/`f64` expect the function to be const, the generic version must be made indirectly stable too. We'd need to check with T-lang this change is ok; the only other intrinsics where there is such a mismatch is `minnum`, `maxnum` and `copysign`. - I haven't touched libm because I'm not familiar with how it works; any guidance would be welcome!
…alebzulawski,antoyo simd_fmin/fmax: make semantics and name consistent with scalar intrinsics This is the SIMD version of rust-lang#153343: change the documented semantics of the SIMD float min/max intrinsics to that of the scalar intrinsics, and also make the name consistent. The overall semantic change this amounts to is that we restrict the non-determinism: the old semantics effectively mean "when one input is an SNaN, the result non-deterministically is a NaN or the other input"; the new semantics say that in this case the other input must be returned. For all other cases, old and new semantics are equivalent. This means all users of these intrinsics that were correct with the old semantics are still correct: the overall set of possible behaviors has become smaller, no new possible behaviors are being added. In terms of providers of this API: - Miri, GCC, and cranelift already implement the new semantics, so no changes are needed. - LLVM is adjusted to use `minimumnum nsz` instead of `minnum`, thus giving us the new semantics. In terms of consumers of this API: - Portable SIMD almost certainly wants to match the scalar behavior, so this is strictly a bugfix here. - Stdarch mostly stopped using the intrinsic, except on nvptx, where arguably the new semantics are closer to what we actually want than the old semantics (rust-lang/stdarch#2056). Q: Should there be an `f` in the intrinsic name to indicate that it is for floats? E.g., `simd_fminimum_number_nsz`? Also see rust-lang#153395.
The `HashStable` and `ToStableHashKey` traits both have a type parameter that is sometimes called `CTX` and sometimes called `HCX`. (In practice this type parameter is always instantiated as `StableHashingContext`.) Similarly, variables with these types are sometimes called `ctx` and sometimes called `hcx`. This inconsistency has bugged me for some time. The `HCX`/`hcx` form is more informative (the `H`/`h` indicates what type of context it is) and it matches other cases like `tcx`, `dcx`, `icx`. Also, RFC 430 says that type parameters should have names that are "concise UpperCamelCase, usually single uppercase letter: T". In this case `H` feels insufficient, and `Hcx` feels better. Therefore, this commit changes the code to use `Hcx`/`hcx` everywhere.
This file has several methods that take a `FnOnce() -> R` closure: - `DepGraph::with_ignore` - `DepGraph::with_query_deserialization` - `DepGraph::with_anon_task` - `DepGraphData::with_anon_task_inner` It also has two methods that take a faux closure via an `A` argument and a `fn(TyCtxt<'tcx>, A) -> R` argument: - DepGraph::with_task - DepGraphData::with_task The rationale is that the faux closure exercises tight control over what state they have access to. This seems silly when (a) they are passed a `TyCtxt`, and (b) when similar nearby functions take real closures. And they are more awkward to use, e.g. requiring multiple arguments to be gathered into a tuple. This commit changes the faux closures to real closures.
Because the things in this module aren't MIR and don't use anything from `rustc_middle::mir`. Also, modules that use `mono` often don't use anything else from `rustc_middle::mir`.
This allows custom JSON targets to compile, as the assembler was previously failing with an error that `-Zunstable-options` had not been set.
Fix compilation for custom JSON targets
and provide it to LLVM for better optimization
…=petrochenkov Use closures more consistently in `dep_graph.rs`. This file has several methods that take a `FnOnce() -> R` closure: - `DepGraph::with_ignore` - `DepGraph::with_query_deserialization` - `DepGraph::with_anon_task` - `DepGraphData::with_anon_task_inner` It also has two methods that take a faux closure via an `A` argument and a `fn(TyCtxt<'tcx>, A) -> R` argument: - DepGraph::with_task - DepGraphData::with_task The rationale is that the faux closure exercises tight control over what state they have access to. This seems silly when (a) they are passed a `TyCtxt`, and (b) when similar nearby functions take real closures. And they are more awkward to use, e.g. requiring multiple arguments to be gathered into a tuple. This commit changes the faux closures to real closures. r? @Zalathar
…iser Start using pattern types in libcore cc rust-lang#135996 Replaces the innards of `NonNull` with `*const T is !null`. This does affect LLVM's optimizations, as now reading the field preserves the metadata that the field is not null, and transmuting to another type (e.g. just a raw pointer), will also preserve that information for optimizations. This can cause LLVM opts to do more work, but it's not guaranteed to produce better machine code. Once we also remove all uses of rustc_layout_scalar_range_start from rustc itself, we can remove the support for that attribute entirely and handle all such needs via pattern types
… r=nnethercote preserve SIMD element type information Preserve the SIMD element type and provide it to LLVM for better optimization. This is relevant for AArch64 types like `int16x4x2_t`, see also llvm/llvm-project#181514. Such types are defined like so: ```rust #[repr(simd)] struct int16x4_t([i16; 4]); #[repr(C)] struct int16x4x2_t(pub int16x4_t, pub int16x4_t); ``` Previously this would be translated to the opaque `[2 x <8 x i8>]`, with this PR it is instead `[2 x <4 x i16>]`. That change is not relevant for the ABI, but using the correct type prevents bitcasts that can (indeed, do) confuse the LLVM pattern matcher. This change will make it possible to implement the deinterleaving loads on AArch64 in a portable way (without neon-specific intrinsics), which means that e.g. Miri or the cranelift backend can run them without additional support. discussion at [#t-compiler > loss of vector element type information](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/loss.20of.20vector.20element.20type.20information/with/584483611)
rustbot
added
T-compiler
Contributor
Author
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
Contributor
rust-bors
Bot
added
S-waiting-on-bors
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
rust-bors Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2026
…uwer Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - #155850 (Only exclude the #155473 change for 1-byte bool-likes) - #155923 (Subtree sync for rustc_codegen_cranelift) - #151994 (switch to v0 mangling by default on stable) - #154325 (Tweak irrefutable let else warning output) - #155899 (`dlltool`: Set the working directory to workaround `--temp-prefix` bug) - #155273 (Lock stable_crate_ids once in create_crate_num) - #155361 (Document that CFI diverges from Rust wrt. ABI-compatibility rules) - #155692 (disable naked-dead-code-elimination test if no RET mnemonic is available) - #155747 (Update documentation for `wasm32-wali-linux-musl` after integrating n…) - #155768 (compiletest: Overhaul the code for running an incremental test revision) - #155907 (Handle hkl const closures) - #155910 (misc stuff from reading borrowck again :)) - #155913 (Delete the 12 year old fixme) - #155920 (remove review queue triagebot mentions)
rust-bors
Bot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Contributor
|
💔 Test for b4b0403 failed: CI. Failed job:
|
Contributor
Author
Contributor
|
Tree closed for PRs with priority less than 1000. |
Contributor
Author
|
@bors retry |
rust-bors
Bot
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Contributor
Author
|
@bors p=1000 |
Contributor
|
⌛ Testing commit 601f0f6 with merge c76825b... Workflow: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/25067583320 |
rust-bors Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2026
…uwer Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - #155850 (Only exclude the #155473 change for 1-byte bool-likes) - #155923 (Subtree sync for rustc_codegen_cranelift) - #151994 (switch to v0 mangling by default on stable) - #154325 (Tweak irrefutable let else warning output) - #155899 (`dlltool`: Set the working directory to workaround `--temp-prefix` bug) - #155273 (Lock stable_crate_ids once in create_crate_num) - #155361 (Document that CFI diverges from Rust wrt. ABI-compatibility rules) - #155692 (disable naked-dead-code-elimination test if no RET mnemonic is available) - #155747 (Update documentation for `wasm32-wali-linux-musl` after integrating n…) - #155768 (compiletest: Overhaul the code for running an incremental test revision) - #155907 (Handle hkl const closures) - #155910 (misc stuff from reading borrowck again :)) - #155913 (Delete the 12 year old fixme) - #155920 (remove review queue triagebot mentions)
This was referenced Apr 28, 2026
rust-bors
Bot
added
S-waiting-on-author
Contributor
|
PR #155899, which is a member of this rollup, was unapproved. This rollup was thus unapproved. Auto build was cancelled due to unapproval. Cancelled workflows: |
rustbot
removed
the
S-waiting-on-author
This was referenced Apr 28, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
20 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
-1forNone#155473 change for 1-byte bool-likes)dlltool: Set the working directory to workaround--temp-prefixbug #155899 (dlltool: Set the working directory to workaround--temp-prefixbug)wasm32-wali-linux-muslafter integrating n… #155747 (Update documentation forwasm32-wali-linux-muslafter integrating n…)r? @ghost
Create a similar rollup