Use alternate means of detecting enums in is_udt#157298
Open
Walnut356 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Collaborator
|
rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum. Use Why was this reviewer chosen?The reviewer was selected based on:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This fixes a small regression from #155336
Flat enums are excluded from
is_udtsince LLDB natively handles them correctly. The previous logic (SBType.IsScopedEnumerationType()) behaved correctly for non-msvc targets, but for some reason on msvc enums don't count as scoped enumerations?The new logic checks the type returned by
SBType.GetEnumerationIntegerType(). If the queried type isn't an enum, the returned type is invalid. This behaves correctly on both msvc and non-msvc targets, and its behavior doesn't conflict with sum-type enums.As always, testing on msvc isn't really possible atm. That should change soon though =)