test(admin): cover repair status id validation - #332
Merged
Conversation
overtrue
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 25, 2026 21:26
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related: recent durable site-replication repair lifecycle changes.
Evidence:
repair executealready rejects malformed preflight tokens before alias/capability lookup, butrepair status --operation-idhad no CLI regression test for the same local validation order.Change: add one integration test proving malformed repair status operation IDs return a usage error before alias or network setup.
Validation:
cargo test -p rustfs-cli --test admin_replicate replicate_repair_status_rejects_invalid_operation_id_before_alias_or_networkCARGO_BUILD_JOBS=2 make pre-commit