Fix crashers in do/while and while(await(..)) #50
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The new tree shapes handled for do/while look like:
// type checked
async({
val b = false;
doWhile$1(){
await(());
if (b)
doWhile$1()
else
()
};
()
})
We had to change ExprBuilder to create states for the if/else
that concludes the doWhile body, and also loosen the assertion
that the label jump must be the last thing we see.
We also have to look for more than just `containsAwait` when
deciding whether an `If` needs to be transformed into states;
it might also contain a jump to the enclosing label that is on
the other side of an `await`, and hence needs to be a state
transition instead.
ghost
assigned
Contributor
|
The Travis build only fails because Travis recently removed the |
Contributor
|
LGTM |
phaller
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 22, 2013
Fix crashers in do/while and while(await(..))
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The new tree shapes handled for do/while look like:
We had to change ExprBuilder to create states for the if/else
that concludes the doWhile body, and also loosen the assertion
that the label jump must be the last thing we see.
We also have to look for more than just
containsAwaitwhendeciding whether an
Ifneeds to be transformed into states;it might also contain a jump to the enclosing label that is on
the other side of an
await, and hence needs to be a statetransition instead.
Fixes #49