Skip to content

Conversation

@retronym
Copy link
Member

Both Scaladoc and genjavadoc take exception to this project.

Finally, I had to remove parameter documentation from the
toJava and toScala decorators, as the reference parameter
was the argument to the implicit conversion, not to the documented
method.

All said an done, we end up with:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/106552/genjavadoc-scala-java8-compat/genjavadoc-api/index.html

Review by @rkuhn. I'm still tossing up wheter to just code this in
Java (we'd have to drop or move the implicit conversions in that case.)

Both Scaladoc and genjavadoc take exception to this project.

  - raw types in the generated mixin composition befuddle
    scaladoc (lodged as https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-8449)
  - implicit classes seem to mess up genjavadoc
  - as do private[pack] classes

Finally, I had to remove parameter documentation from the
`toJava` and `toScala` decorators, as the reference parameter
was the argument to the implicit conversion, not to the documented
method.

All said an done, we end up with:

 https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/106552/genjavadoc-scala-java8-compat/genjavadoc-api/index.html
@rkuhn
Copy link
Contributor

rkuhn commented Mar 26, 2014

LGTM, thanks again; I’ll try to fix genjavadoc, but that might not happen this week.

retronym added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2014
Workaround bugs in doc tools
@retronym retronym merged commit 58ce6af into scala:master Mar 26, 2014
@retronym retronym added this to the 0.1.0 milestone Mar 26, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants