Add Chainlink Driver - #132
Merged
Merged
Conversation
dmadison
added a commit
to dmadison/splitflap
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2021
These were removed as part of the chainlink driver PR (scottbez1#132) and the consolidation to 'LATCH_PIN' for the ESP32.
scottbez1
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2021
These were removed as part of the chainlink driver PR (#132) and the consolidation to 'LATCH_PIN' for the ESP32.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There's a lot going on here, but it's time to start merging some of this to master to avoid diverging too far on a branch.
#define CHAINLINK. General ESP32 support should mostly still work, but no guaranteesmoduleDriver(I'll clean this up in future commits)espShifteris the vestigial remains of a prior iteration of the Chainlink system; it is not useful. This will eventually become the Chainlink Central Controller, but again, it's more important to me to get the rest of these changes (which diverge and may cause conflicts) merged sooner, instead of spending the time to clean everything up first (potentially causing more divergence/conflicts in the meantime)