Skip to content

fix: torch<2.11 compat#180

Merged
ilan-gold merged 15 commits intomainfrom
ig/torch_211
Mar 26, 2026
Merged

fix: torch<2.11 compat#180
ilan-gold merged 15 commits intomainfrom
ig/torch_211

Conversation

@ilan-gold
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@ilan-gold ilan-gold added the run-gpu-ci Signal that gpu ci should be run label Mar 26, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the run-gpu-ci Signal that gpu ci should be run label Mar 26, 2026
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Mar 26, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 25.00000% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 90.17%. Comparing base (784014a) to head (d599081).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/annbatch/__init__.py 37.50% 5 Missing ⚠️
src/annbatch/utils.py 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #180      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.82%   90.17%   -2.65%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines         948      957       +9     
==========================================
- Hits          880      863      -17     
- Misses         68       94      +26     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/annbatch/utils.py 86.02% <0.00%> (-7.46%) ⬇️
src/annbatch/__init__.py 68.75% <37.50%> (-31.25%) ⬇️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ilan-gold ilan-gold added the run-gpu-ci Signal that gpu ci should be run label Mar 26, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the run-gpu-ci Signal that gpu ci should be run label Mar 26, 2026
@ilan-gold ilan-gold added the run-gpu-ci Signal that gpu ci should be run label Mar 26, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the run-gpu-ci Signal that gpu ci should be run label Mar 26, 2026
@ilan-gold ilan-gold added the run-gpu-ci Signal that gpu ci should be run label Mar 26, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the run-gpu-ci Signal that gpu ci should be run label Mar 26, 2026
@ilan-gold ilan-gold added the run-gpu-ci Signal that gpu ci should be run label Mar 26, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the run-gpu-ci Signal that gpu ci should be run label Mar 26, 2026
@ilan-gold ilan-gold added the run-gpu-ci Signal that gpu ci should be run label Mar 26, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the run-gpu-ci Signal that gpu ci should be run label Mar 26, 2026
@ilan-gold ilan-gold added the run-gpu-ci Signal that gpu ci should be run label Mar 26, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the run-gpu-ci Signal that gpu ci should be run label Mar 26, 2026
@ilan-gold ilan-gold added the run-gpu-ci Signal that gpu ci should be run label Mar 26, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the run-gpu-ci Signal that gpu ci should be run label Mar 26, 2026
@ilan-gold ilan-gold added the run-gpu-ci Signal that gpu ci should be run label Mar 26, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the run-gpu-ci Signal that gpu ci should be run label Mar 26, 2026
@ilan-gold ilan-gold added the skip-gpu-ci Whether gpu ci should be skipped label Mar 26, 2026
@ilan-gold ilan-gold enabled auto-merge (squash) March 26, 2026 10:58
@ilan-gold ilan-gold merged commit 8460542 into main Mar 26, 2026
12 checks passed
@ilan-gold ilan-gold deleted the ig/torch_211 branch March 26, 2026 11:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

skip-gpu-ci Whether gpu ci should be skipped

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant