Skip to content

Backport release/v6.4: Unify EVM SS into single DB with store key prefixes#3211

Merged
masih merged 2 commits intorelease/v6.4from
backport-3134-to-release/v6.4
Apr 8, 2026
Merged

Backport release/v6.4: Unify EVM SS into single DB with store key prefixes#3211
masih merged 2 commits intorelease/v6.4from
backport-3134-to-release/v6.4

Conversation

@seidroid
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@seidroid seidroid bot commented Apr 8, 2026

Backport of #3134 to release/v6.4.

@seidroid seidroid bot added the backport label Apr 8, 2026
@seidroid seidroid bot assigned Kbhat1 Apr 8, 2026
@seidroid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

seidroid bot commented Apr 8, 2026

Please cherry-pick the changes locally and resolve any conflicts.

git fetch origin backport-3134-to-release/v6.4
git worktree add --checkout .worktree/backport-3134-to-release/v6.4 backport-3134-to-release/v6.4
cd .worktree/backport-3134-to-release/v6.4
git reset --hard HEAD^
git cherry-pick -x 36f9664790cf86a33a287670e8939d466a8c339f
git push --force-with-lease

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Apr 8, 2026

The latest Buf updates on your PR. Results from workflow Buf / buf (pull_request).

BuildFormatLintBreakingUpdated (UTC)
✅ passed✅ passed✅ passed✅ passedApr 8, 2026, 4:09 PM

- Consolidate EVM state-store sub-DBs into a single DB by default while
preserving the existing evm keyspace and MVCC key encoding
- Add configuration to optionally split EVM data back across per-type
physical DBs without changing logical read/write behavior.

- Unit tests
- Verifying w/ state sync on node

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit 36f9664)
@Kbhat1 Kbhat1 force-pushed the backport-3134-to-release/v6.4 branch from 4e9d36e to 1612d33 Compare April 8, 2026 16:07
Adapt the backported EVM SS changes to the release branch's sei-iavl changeset types so the cherry-pick builds and tests cleanly.

Made-with: Cursor
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 8, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 64.58333% with 34 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 58.36%. Comparing base (a562bab) to head (b465901).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on release/v6.4.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
sei-db/state_db/ss/evm/store.go 62.50% 23 Missing and 7 partials ⚠️
app/seidb.go 20.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##           release/v6.4    #3211   +/-   ##
=============================================
  Coverage         58.35%   58.36%           
=============================================
  Files              2091     2091           
  Lines            172923   172983   +60     
=============================================
+ Hits             100917   100963   +46     
- Misses            63000    63009    +9     
- Partials           9006     9011    +5     
Flag Coverage Δ
sei-chain-pr 53.63% <64.58%> (?)
sei-db 70.41% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
sei-cosmos/server/config/config.go 94.79% <100.00%> (+0.11%) ⬆️
sei-db/config/ss_config.go 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
sei-db/state_db/ss/composite/store.go 69.75% <100.00%> (+1.92%) ⬆️
sei-db/state_db/ss/evm/types.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)
app/seidb.go 68.96% <20.00%> (+5.11%) ⬆️
sei-db/state_db/ss/evm/store.go 59.34% <62.50%> (-1.37%) ⬇️
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@Kbhat1 Kbhat1 marked this pull request as ready for review April 8, 2026 17:12
@masih masih merged commit f3e1578 into release/v6.4 Apr 8, 2026
40 of 41 checks passed
@masih masih deleted the backport-3134-to-release/v6.4 branch April 8, 2026 17:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants