Skip to content

docs(ticket-049): Validator autonomy audit, operator guide and follow-up tickets - #67

Open
tom-sapletta-com wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
ticket/049-validator-autonomy-plan
Open

docs(ticket-049): Validator autonomy audit, operator guide and follow-up tickets#67
tom-sapletta-com wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
ticket/049-validator-autonomy-plan

Conversation

@tom-sapletta-com

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ticket: ticket-049
Correlation ID: todo2code-pr-ticket-049-plan

Summary

Planning-only PR: autonomy audit after the GOV-APPROVAL stall on PR #66, an operator guide for direct-pr / scan-direct, and scaffolded follow-up tickets 050–052.

Contents

  • project/ticket-049/AUTONOMY_AND_REFACTOR_PLAN.md — failure modes, agent process fixes, phases A–D
  • project/ticket-049/OPERATOR_GUIDE.md — triage and dispatch commands
  • project/ticket-050 — own or exclude CHANGELOG.md / .env.example
  • project/ticket-051 — CI wiring of github-event-log with explicit flags
  • project/ticket-052 — promote checklist into AGENTS.md

All tickets remain PLAN / WAIT_FOR_APPROVAL. No executable source or workflow change.

Note

Does not merge PR #66. Ticket-048 stays the active implementation ticket on its own branch.

tom-sapletta-com and others added 3 commits August 6, 2026 18:06
Record why GOV-APPROVAL autonomy failed for todo2code (variables without
scan-direct matrix), ship the operator guide and ordered refactor plan, and
scaffold tickets 050-052 for unowned root paths, CI wiring of github-event-log,
and AGENTS.md checklist promotion. All remain PLAN / WAIT_FOR_APPROVAL.
Cross-link twin-probes publication.gate (diagnostic probe, not trust root),
validator freeze dispatcher, and skills-agent process. Record external PR
landings and GitHub Actions outage as a publication blocker.
Conditions 1-8 of steady-state autonomy all held for PR #66 on 2026-08-06 and
no review appeared. Adds precondition 9: the validator run must actually obtain
a runner.

Records the zero-steps signature — a job with no steps that is then cancelled
never started — as the way to tell an infrastructure stall from a validator
rejection, which always produces steps and a verdict.

Also warns against the inference this section originally drew: during an
Actions major_outage an uneven backlog is not evidence of an organization
budget problem, because a repository that keeps draining is not a control
group.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant