Skip to content

Conversation

@simonwuelker
Copy link
Contributor

@simonwuelker simonwuelker commented Oct 23, 2025

This change was split of from #39977 to make that PR easier to review.

The Debug impl for the error is not very useful yet, but #39977 swaps out the error type itself, so there's no point in improving it here.

Testing: I've manually tested that the error message appears. I don't think we have tests for error messages.
Part of #34527

Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
@servo-highfive servo-highfive added the S-awaiting-review There is new code that needs to be reviewed. label Oct 23, 2025
@servo-highfive servo-highfive removed the S-awaiting-review There is new code that needs to be reviewed. label Oct 23, 2025
@jdm jdm added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 23, 2025
@servo-highfive servo-highfive added the S-awaiting-merge The PR is in the process of compiling and running tests on the automated CI. label Oct 23, 2025
Merged via the queue into servo:main with commit 184fc21 Oct 23, 2025
34 checks passed
@servo-highfive servo-highfive removed the S-awaiting-merge The PR is in the process of compiling and running tests on the automated CI. label Oct 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants