Skip to content

docs: future-proof the contributor docs for a growing team - #2

Open
MatejGomboc wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/future-proof-team-wording
Open

docs: future-proof the contributor docs for a growing team#2
MatejGomboc wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/future-proof-team-wording

Conversation

@MatejGomboc

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Three living documents promised "one maintainer" β€” wording that would start lying the day the anticipated team member joins. SECURITY.md, CONTRIBUTING.md and CLAUDE.md now say "deliberately small team". The constitution's Β§5 is deliberately untouched: its role-based wording still holds, and the real amendment (who reviews, who may merge) waits for the member's actual role β€” the maintainer's pen, not this PR's.

Which pillar does this serve?

None β€” documentation toil. Records (changelogs, RFC amendments) keep their historical wording; only forward-looking guidance changed.

Borrow Ledger

Not applicable β€” no code touched.

unsafe register

  • New unsafe blocks: None

Checklist

  • British spelling (check-british-spelling.sh clean)
  • Markdown lint-clean
  • CHANGELOG.md updated under [Unreleased]
  • Commits GPG-signed

First pull request under the new ruleset β€” it doubles as the live test of ci_pr.yml on a real pull_request event.

πŸ€– Generated with Claude Code

The project anticipates at least one more team member, and three living
documents promised "one maintainer" β€” a sentence that would start lying the
day someone joins. SECURITY.md, CONTRIBUTING.md and CLAUDE.md now say
"deliberately small team", which stays true on both sides of that day.

The constitution's Β§5 is deliberately untouched. Its wording is role-based
("the maintainer") and still holds; the real amendment β€” who reviews, who
may merge β€” depends on the member's actual role, and is the maintainer's to
write when that person exists rather than guessed at now.

Records (changelogs, RFC amendment texts) keep their historical wording:
they describe the project as it was, which is their job.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant