Reword security audit guidance for defensive remediation#1
Merged
Conversation
…assignment) alongside defensive framing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This updates the security section of the audit playbook to use more explicitly defensive, remediation-focused language.
The intent is to preserve the same review coverage while making the instructions friendlier to stricter safety-routed models that may treat vulnerability-investigation phrasing as higher risk. The revised wording asks agents to:
This should make the skill more reliable with stricter models while keeping security improvement work practical and actionable.