[pull] master from rust-lang:master#507
Merged
pull[bot] merged 13 commits intoshigma:masterfrom Oct 3, 2025
Merged
Conversation
for example, if we're showing `Iterator::next`, we don't need to also show `Range::next` in the results. Co-authored-by: Michael Howell <michael@notriddle.com>
If the `LocalRef` is `LocalRef::Place`, we can refer to it directly, because the local of place is an indirect pointer. Such a statement is `_1 = &(_2.1)`. If the `LocalRef` is `LocalRef::Operand`, the `OperandRef` should provide the pointer of the reference. Such a statement is `_1 = &((*_2).1)`. But there is a special case that hasn't been handled, scalar pairs like `(&[i32; 16], i32)`.
…uillaumeGomez,notriddle If a trait item appears in rustdoc search, hide the corrosponding impl items fixes #138251 cc `@notriddle`
Introduce debuginfo to statements in MIR The PR introduces support for debug information within dead statements. Currently, only the reference statement is supported, which is sufficient to fix #128081. I don't modify Stable MIR, as I don't think we need debug information when using it. This PR represents the debug information for the dead reference statement via `#dbg_value`. For example, `let _foo_b = &foo.b` becomes `#dbg_value(ptr %foo, !22, !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus_uconst, 4, DW_OP_stack_value), !26)`. You can see this here: https://rust.godbolt.org/z/d43js6adv. The general principle for handling debug information is to never provide less debug information than the optimized LLVM IR. The current rules for dropping debug information in this PR are: - If the LLVM IR cannot represent a reference address, it's replaced with poison or simply dropped. For example, see: https://rust.godbolt.org/z/shGqPec8W. I'm using poison in all such cases now. - All debuginfos is dropped when merging multiple successor BBs. An example is available here: https://rust.godbolt.org/z/TE1q3Wq6M. I doesn't drop debuginfos in `MatchBranchSimplification`, because LLVM also pick one branch for it.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See Commits and Changes for more details.
Created by
pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.4)
Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )