The answers

What comes back from the page. The reviewer downloads the answered page (HTML) or the JSON; the agent turns an HTML page into this file with answer.mjs, and checks it before acting.

The value: the answer is data, not a paragraph. Any agent, a script or a person a year later can read it, without the page and without the original review.

What it holds

Part	What it is	The value
responses	One entry per question: its title echoed, the verdict, the note	Readable on its own; an unanswered question is written down as unset, never left out
gaps	Every answer that needs work, and every unanswered one	The agent starts with what is open, not with what went well
summary	Totals by verdict	Recomputed by the checker; a hand-edited file can't lie about its own numbers
choices	The option picked in each choose-one section, and whether it followed the recommendation	The agent says plainly when you overruled it, and doesn't argue again
addedItems	What the reviewer raised that nobody asked about	Often the most valuable part; the agent must quote it word for word
requests	"Show me an example" or "Explain it differently" on a question	Answered in the next round, where the reviewer asked
comments	Marks on a box or arrow of a diagram, with words	Feedback on the agent's own picture, not only in text
pictures	Screenshots or photos attached to a note or comment	Show, don't describe; hidden details (like a photo's location) are removed
layerVerdicts	An answer on one thing behind a step (a system part, a data change)	A developer can judge the details without a separate review
respondent, respondedAt, via	Who, when, and how it came back (page or chat)	Context for the report; never proof of identity

What an answer means, and what it doesn't

• Unanswered is not agreement. It is a gap, carried to the next round.
• "Agree" is an opinion, never permission. Before anything that deletes, sends, pays, publishes or contacts someone, the agent still asks you in its own tool, naming the exact action.
• The file is unsigned. It proves the answer fits the review, not who gave it.
• Two copies with different answers are never merged: the person who asked for the review decides which counts, and the next round asks each difference again.