Skip to content

Conversation

@dapplion
Copy link
Collaborator

Issue Addressed

N/A

Proposed Changes

Schedule Gnosis merge

Additional Info

N/A

Copy link
Member

@michaelsproul michaelsproul left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We also need to update the ChainSpec::gnosis function to match.

You can run cargo test --release in common/eth2_network_config to check everything matches

@michaelsproul
Copy link
Member

michaelsproul commented Nov 15, 2022

Hmm, seems I was wrong. There's no test in eth2_network_config that catches this 😦. I think there might be a preset test, but that's unlikely to be sufficient.

I'll fix this up and push to your branch if you don't mind?

@dapplion
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hmm, seems I was wrong. There's no test in eth2_network_config that catches this frowning. I think there might be a preset test, but that's unlikely to be sufficient.

I'll fix this up and push to your branch if you don't mind?

Yes please, take over the branch, thank you!

@michaelsproul michaelsproul added ready-for-review The code is ready for review A0 v3.3.0 Minor release following v3.2.0 labels Nov 15, 2022
@michaelsproul
Copy link
Member

Confirmed that this works on my Gnosis node (with Nethermind's master branch) 😎

Nov 18 05:36:37.503 INFO Ready for the merge current_difficulty: 8519301852020543110622850477420385442753109103, terminal_total_difficulty: 8626000000000000000000058750000000000000000000, service: slot_notifier

Will get one more sanity check from a Lighthouse dev then we can merge 🎉

@paulhauner paulhauner self-assigned this Nov 21, 2022
Copy link
Member

@paulhauner paulhauner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me! Let's mergeeee 🎉 Props to @dapplion for being the Danny Ryan of Gnosis ❤️

@paulhauner paulhauner added ready-for-merge This PR is ready to merge. and removed ready-for-review The code is ready for review labels Nov 21, 2022
@paulhauner
Copy link
Member

bors r+

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2022
## Issue Addressed

N/A

## Proposed Changes

Schedule Gnosis merge
- Upstream config PR: gnosischain/configs#3
- Nethermind PR: NethermindEth/nethermind#4901
- Public announcement: https://twitter.com/gnosischain/status/1592589482641223682

## Additional Info

N/A

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
@bors bors bot changed the title Schedule gnosis merge [Merged by Bors] - Schedule gnosis merge Nov 21, 2022
@bors bors bot closed this Nov 21, 2022
macladson pushed a commit to macladson/lighthouse that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2023
## Issue Addressed

N/A

## Proposed Changes

Schedule Gnosis merge
- Upstream config PR: gnosischain/configs#3
- Nethermind PR: NethermindEth/nethermind#4901
- Public announcement: https://twitter.com/gnosischain/status/1592589482641223682

## Additional Info

N/A

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
Woodpile37 pushed a commit to Woodpile37/lighthouse that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2024
## Issue Addressed

N/A

## Proposed Changes

Schedule Gnosis merge
- Upstream config PR: gnosischain/configs#3
- Nethermind PR: NethermindEth/nethermind#4901
- Public announcement: https://twitter.com/gnosischain/status/1592589482641223682

## Additional Info

N/A

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
@dapplion dapplion deleted the gnosis-ttd branch January 24, 2025 18:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A0 ready-for-merge This PR is ready to merge. v3.3.0 Minor release following v3.2.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants