Skip to content

Conversation

@priscilladeroode
Copy link
Contributor

@priscilladeroode priscilladeroode commented Mar 5, 2025

On BaseApp Frontend there is a test on Comments that is flaky, meaning, sometimes it passes and sometimes it does not, so we need to investigate and fix that.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Refined test validations for comment loading to ensure the display updates correctly once new comments are fetched.

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Mar 5, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: f5cc1a1

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 5, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the test cases for the comments component. The modified test now checks that after triggering comment loading by scrolling, the loading indicator is absent and the "Fifth comment" is present. The check for the loading state is reordered to occur before verifying the new comment, ensuring the test reflects the intended component behavior. No changes were made to publicly exported entities.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
packages/components/.../Comments/__tests__/Comments.cy.tsx Modified the test for loading more comments by removing the scroll-based loading indicator check; added an assertion to verify that "Fifth comment" is rendered after the loading state is confirmed absent.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant T as Test
    participant C as CommentsComponent

    T->>C: Scroll to bottom to trigger loading
    C-->>T: Load additional comments
    T->>C: Verify loading indicator is absent
    T->>C: Assert "Fifth comment" is present
Loading

Suggested Reviewers

  • deboracosilveira
  • anicioalexandre

Poem

I'm a little rabbit hopping through the test code,
Finding changes sprouting on each new road.
The loading ghost now fades to the night,
While "Fifth comment" springs forth in light.
Hoppy cheers and ASCII delights! 🐇✨

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

packages/components/modules/comments/web/Comments/__tests__/Comments.cy.tsx

Oops! Something went wrong! :(

ESLint: 8.57.1

Error: Cannot read config file: /packages/components/.eslintrc.js
Error: Cannot find module '@baseapp-frontend/config/.eslintrc-with-restricted-paths.js'
Require stack:

  • /packages/components/.eslintrc.js
  • /node_modules/.pnpm/@eslint+eslintrc@2.1.4/node_modules/@eslint/eslintrc/dist/eslintrc.cjs
  • /node_modules/.pnpm/eslint@8.57.1/node_modules/eslint/lib/cli-engine/cli-engine.js
  • /node_modules/.pnpm/eslint@8.57.1/node_modules/eslint/lib/eslint/eslint.js
  • /node_modules/.pnpm/eslint@8.57.1/node_modules/eslint/lib/eslint/index.js
  • /node_modules/.pnpm/eslint@8.57.1/node_modules/eslint/lib/cli.js
  • /node_modules/.pnpm/eslint@8.57.1/node_modules/eslint/bin/eslint.js
    at Module._resolveFilename (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1248:15)
    at Module._load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1074:27)
    at TracingChannel.traceSync (node:diagnostics_channel:315:14)
    at wrapModuleLoad (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:217:24)
    at Module.require (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1339:12)
    at require (node:internal/modules/helpers:135:16)
    at Object. (/packages/components/.eslintrc.js:1:18)
    at Module._compile (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1546:14)
    at Module._extensions..js (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1691:10)
    at Module.load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1317:32)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Mar 5, 2025

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/components/modules/comments/web/Comments/__tests__/Comments.cy.tsx (1)

216-226: Improved test reliability by correcting test flow and assertions

The changes properly address the flaky test issue by improving the test sequence and assertions to better match the component's behavior.

The changes fix the flaky test by ensuring the correct sequence of events:

  1. The test now verifies the "Fifth comment" is loaded after scrolling to the "Fourth comment"
  2. It then properly checks that the loading indicator disappears after the comments are loaded

This change makes the test more deterministic. To further enhance the test's readability and reliability, consider adding a comment explaining the expected loading behavior:

    cy.step('Scroll to the bottom and see the next 5 comments')

+   // Scrolling to the fourth comment should load the fifth comment immediately
    cy.findByText('Fourth comment').should('exist').scrollIntoView()
    cy.findByText('Fifth comment').should('exist').scrollIntoView()

+   // After scrolling to the fifth comment, more comments should be loading
    cy.findByLabelText('loading more comments')
      .should('exist')
      .then(() => {
        resolveMostRecentOperation({ data: commentsNextPageMockData })
      })

+   // After resolving the operation, loading should complete and more comments should be visible
    cy.findByLabelText('loading more comments').should('not.exist')
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a271d70 and f5cc1a1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/components/modules/comments/web/Comments/__tests__/Comments.cy.tsx (1 hunks)

@priscilladeroode priscilladeroode merged commit fdbccd9 into master Mar 5, 2025
6 checks passed
@nossila nossila deleted the BA-2334-fe-packages-investigate-and-fix-flaky-tests branch May 26, 2025 21:14
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jul 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants