Public tracker for structuring decisions on Skilluv.
A Request for Comments is a structured document proposing a significant change to Skilluv — product, technology, governance, community process. Inspired by Rust RFCs and Python PEPs.
Open an RFC when the change:
- Modifies the Skilluv product roadmap or strategy
- Changes the community charter or governance
- Introduces a new stack technology to the official recommendations
- Modifies the economic model (talents, mentors, enterprises)
- Requires community feedback before implementation
You do NOT need an RFC for:
- Bug fixes
- Small UI improvements
- Documentation updates
- Individual contributions to existing repositories
- Draft — fork this repo, create
NNNN-my-topic.mdintext/using template.md. Number is next available (check open PRs to avoid collisions). - Open PR — the RFC PR is the discussion venue.
- Discussion window — 14 days minimum for the community to comment. Some RFCs have longer windows (30 days for structural changes).
- Final decision — by Jérémie in 2027 (see governance in RFC 0000). By steward committee from 2028.
- Merged or rejected — merged RFC = "Accepted". Rejected RFC = closed with rationale.
- Implementation — accepted RFCs are tracked in a follow-up issue on the impacted repository.
- Draft — being written
- Discussion — PR open, comments welcome
- Accepted — merged, awaiting implementation
- Rejected — closed, rationale in final comment
- Superseded — replaced by a later RFC
- Withdrawn — author gave up
See text/ for the list. Notable RFCs:
The RFC process is itself defined by RFC 0000 — Governance, which is a meta-RFC describing how Skilluv makes decisions.
Contributions to this repository are licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
- Public:
#rfcscategory on the Skilluv forum - Private:
rfcs@skilluv.io