Skip to content

pod: Revert back to published 0.7.2 state#192

Merged
grod220 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
revert-spl-pod
Mar 26, 2026
Merged

pod: Revert back to published 0.7.2 state#192
grod220 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
revert-spl-pod

Conversation

@grod220
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@grod220 grod220 commented Mar 20, 2026

Comment on lines +23 to +27
spl-discriminator = "0.5.1"
spl-list-view = "0.1.0"
spl-program-error = "0.8.0"
spl-pod = "0.7.1"
spl-type-length-value = "0.9.0"
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Temporarily pinned back to published crates so this revert can land cleanly. Local spl-list-view has already moved to the newer PodLength contract, while this reverted local spl-pod 0.7.2 still exposes the old PodU32 conversion contract.

The next PR can switch it back to local path deps once spl-pod is updated with the new aliases.

@grod220 grod220 requested review from febo and joncinque March 20, 2026 09:55
@grod220 grod220 changed the title Revert back to published 0.7.2 state pod: Revert back to published 0.7.2 state Mar 20, 2026
joncinque
joncinque previously approved these changes Mar 25, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@joncinque joncinque left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Confirming that the pod directly exactly matches the 0.7.2 code, thanks! Sorry for the slowness

@grod220
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

grod220 commented Mar 26, 2026

Merge conflicts + rebased ✅

@grod220 grod220 requested a review from joncinque March 26, 2026 08:05
@grod220 grod220 merged commit bd5dc77 into main Mar 26, 2026
51 checks passed
@grod220 grod220 deleted the revert-spl-pod branch March 26, 2026 12:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants