Skip to content

Add Type Indexes to the Solid Technical Reports listing#786

Open
jeswr wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/tr-list-type-indexes
Open

Add Type Indexes to the Solid Technical Reports listing#786
jeswr wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/tr-list-type-indexes

Conversation

@jeswr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jeswr jeswr commented Apr 26, 2026

A preview link can be found here.

Summary

Adds Type Indexes to the Work Items table on the Solid Technical Reports index. The spec was not listed even though it is treated as a TR work item across other specifications:

What's in this PR

  • New row in the Work Items table for Type Indexes — inserted between Solid Application Interoperability and Shape Trees, keeping it adjacent to the data-discovery / interop cluster.
Field Value
Work Item Type Indexes
Repository https://github.com/solid/type-indexes
Current Stage v1.0.0, Editor's Draft

Test plan

  • Render index.html and confirm the new Type Indexes row appears between SAI and Shape Trees.
  • All three links in the row resolve.

Type Indexes (https://solid.github.io/type-indexes/, v1.0.0, Editor's
Draft) was missing from the Work Items table even though it is treated
as a TR work item across other specifications (notably Solid
Application Interoperability and the Solid WebID Profile § Discovery,
which both reference it as an established mechanism). Insert the row
between SAI and Shape Trees, alongside the data-discovery cluster.
jeswr added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2026
- §2.1 access-control bullet: name the SAI Authorization Agent as a
  concrete example of an access-management Client (per @elf-pavlik on
  PR #776).
- §4 data discovery note: hyperlink Solid Application Interoperability
  to TR/sai. Add an editor's note that a Type Indexes link will be
  added once PR #786 (which lists Type Indexes as a TR work item) is
  merged.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@csarven csarven left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Solid Type Indexes wasn't proposed as a work item in the CG in 2022 (initial publication) because the process for new work item proposals wasn't until 2023: #543 . And, the item just didn't get listed at TR/ .

Needless to say, there are many items in TR/ predating the process that weren't proposed following that procedure and carried on as usual, and were added to TR/ .

So, I think Solid Type Indexes should also be listed in TR/ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants