Add DOMPurify to address XSS issues; closes #420 #4

sourcery-ai-experiments-bot · 2024-04-22T20:02:49Z

Co-authored-by: sourcery-ai[bot] <58596630+sourcery-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

sourcery-ai-experiments-bot · 2024-04-22T20:02:55Z

This is a benchmark review for experiment review_of_reviews_20240422_1934.
Run ID: review_of_reviews_20240422_1934/benchmark_2024-04-22T19-34-40_v1-16-0-167-g495a26b3d.

This pull request was cloned from https://github.com/zen-audio-player/zen-audio-player.github.io/pull/431. (Note: the URL is not a link to avoid triggering a notification on the original pull request.)

Experiment configuration

review_config:
  # User configuration for the review
  # - benchmark - use the user config from the benchmark reviews
  # - <value> - use the value directly
  user_config:
    enable_ai_review: true
    enable_rule_comments: false

    enable_complexity_comments: benchmark
    enable_docstring_comments: benchmark
    enable_security_comments: benchmark
    enable_tests_comments: benchmark
    enable_comment_suggestions: benchmark

    enable_approvals: true

  ai_review_config:
    # The model responses to use for the experiment
    # - benchmark - use the model responses from the benchmark reviews
    # - llm - call the language model to generate responses
    model_responses:
      comments_model: benchmark
      comment_validation_model: benchmark
      comment_suggestion_model: benchmark
      complexity_model: benchmark
      docstrings_model: benchmark
      security_model: benchmark
      tests_model: benchmark

# The pull request dataset to run the experiment on
pull_request_dataset:
- https://github.com/erxes/erxes/pull/5153
- https://github.com/0ussamaBernou/my-portfolio/pull/6
- https://github.com/strawberry-graphql/strawberry/pull/3467
- https://github.com/shreejitverma/MScFE690-Capstone/pull/6
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/kfactory/pull/298
- https://github.com/2lambda123/kwenta/pull/50
- https://github.com/EduardSchwarzkopf/pecuny/pull/128
- https://github.com/ElectronicBabylonianLiterature/ebl-api/pull/546
- https://github.com/ShiroePL/EasternTalesShelf/pull/44
- https://github.com/kloudlite/web/pull/195
- https://github.com/dciborow/action-pylint/pull/14
- https://github.com/4DNucleome/PartSeg/pull/1099
- https://github.com/nbhirud/nbhirud.github.io/pull/6
- https://github.com/EduardSchwarzkopf/pecuny/pull/129
- https://github.com/Xmaster6y/mulsi/pull/17
- https://github.com/shreejitverma/MScFE690-Capstone/pull/5
- https://github.com/zen-audio-player/zen-audio-player.github.io/pull/431
- https://github.com/Xmaster6y/mulsi/pull/15
- https://github.com/LunaPurpleSunshine/ipget/pull/196
- https://github.com/erxes/erxes/pull/5152
- https://github.com/ShiroePL/EasternTalesShelf/pull/45
- https://github.com/LunaPurpleSunshine/ipget/pull/195
- https://github.com/osama1998H/spms/pull/56
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/gdsfactory/pull/2694
- https://github.com/shreejitverma/MScFE690-Capstone/pull/4
- https://github.com/albumentations-team/albumentations/pull/1679
- https://github.com/osama1998H/spms/pull/57
- https://github.com/CPUT-DEVS/devpost-hackathon/pull/29
- https://github.com/Amm1rr/WebAI-to-API/pull/31
- https://github.com/DevCycleHQ/go-server-sdk/pull/248
- https://github.com/0ussamaBernou/my-portfolio/pull/8
- https://github.com/LunaPurpleSunshine/ipget/pull/194
- https://github.com/jackdewinter/pymarkdown/pull/1061
- https://github.com/osism/python-osism/pull/869
- https://github.com/nbhirud/nbhirud.github.io/pull/5
- https://github.com/CPUT-DEVS/devpost-hackathon/pull/28
- https://github.com/yaitoo/sqle/pull/41
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/kfactory/pull/300
- https://github.com/osama1998H/spms/pull/55
- https://github.com/shreejitverma/MScFE690-Capstone/pull/7
- https://github.com/nbhirud/system_update/pull/18
- https://github.com/jackdewinter/pymarkdown/pull/1060
- https://github.com/strawberry-graphql/strawberry/pull/3469
- https://github.com/Xmaster6y/mulsi/pull/18
- https://github.com/jkool702/openwrt/pull/41
- https://github.com/nbhirud/nbhirud.github.io/pull/4
- https://github.com/NoobInDaHause/NoobCogs/pull/13
- https://github.com/UCL/dxss/pull/63
- https://github.com/nbhirud/nbhirud.github.io/pull/3
- https://github.com/nbhirud/system_update/pull/17
review_comment_labels:
- label: correct
  question: Is this comment correct?
- label: helpful
  question: Is this comment helpful?
- label: comment-type
  question: Is the comment type correct?
- label: comment-area
  question: Is the comment area correct?
- label: llm-test
  question: Should this comment become an LLM test?

# Benchmark reviews generated by running
#   python -m scripts.experiment benchmark <experiment_name>
benchmark_reviews: []

SourceryAI

Hey @sourcery-ai-experiments-bot - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
🟢 Security: all looks good
🟡 Testing: 1 issue found
🟢 Complexity: all looks good
🟢 Docstrings: all looks good

LangSmith trace

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.}

SourceryAI · 2024-04-22T20:06:16Z

bower_components/DOMPurify/src/utils.js

+const {
+  entries,
+  setPrototypeOf,
+  isFrozen,
+  getPrototypeOf,
+  getOwnPropertyDescriptor,
+} = Object;


suggestion (code_refinement): Consider destructuring directly in the import statement for clarity.

Destructuring directly in the import statement can make the code cleaner and more readable by reducing the need for additional destructuring assignments inside the module.

Is this comment correct?

Is this comment helpful?

Is the comment type correct?

Is the comment area correct?

Should this comment become an LLM test?

SourceryAI · 2024-04-22T20:06:16Z

test/javascript_components.js

+        it("should load DOMPurify and sanitize", async function() {
+            const page = await browser.newPage();
+            await page.goto(indexHTMLURL);
+
+            const dp = await page.evaluate(() => {
+                return Object.keys(window).includes("DOMPurify");
+            });
+            assert.ok(dp, "DOMPurify should be loaded on the page.");
+
+            const sanitizedOutput = await page.evaluate(() => {
+                const dirty = "<img src=\"x\" onerror=\"alert(1)\">";
+                return window.DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty);
+            });
+            assert.strictEqual(sanitizedOutput, "<img src=\"x\">", "DOMPurify should sanitize malicious scripts correctly.");


suggestion (testing): Consider adding more test cases for DOMPurify.

It's great to see tests for basic DOMPurify functionality. Consider adding more cases to cover different types of XSS payloads and tag combinations to ensure robust sanitization.

Is this comment correct?

Is this comment helpful?

Is the comment type correct?

Is the comment area correct?

Should this comment become an LLM test?

shakeelmohamed and others added 4 commits April 20, 2024 22:33

Add DOMPurify to address XSS issues; closes zen-audio-player#420

887e6bf

Update test/javascript_components.js

289fee3

Co-authored-by: sourcery-ai[bot] <58596630+sourcery-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

add sourcery config; pull travis CI config

a73c24c

fix sourcery AI test problem

773b6f0

SourceryAI approved these changes Apr 22, 2024

View reviewed changes

Add DOMPurify to address XSS issues; closes #420 #4

Are you sure you want to change the base?

Add DOMPurify to address XSS issues; closes #420 #4

Uh oh!

Conversation

sourcery-ai-experiments-bot commented Apr 22, 2024

Uh oh!

sourcery-ai-experiments-bot commented Apr 22, 2024

Uh oh!

SourceryAI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants