Add sealed time to bottle platform data

[laura-splits]

Add sealed_at field in the bottle platform data for display.

[github-actions]

The latest Buf updates on your PR. Results from workflow Buf CI / buf (pull_request).

Build	Format	Lint	Breaking	Updated (UTC)
✅ passed	✅ passed	✅ passed	✅ passed	Aug 5, 2026, 3:06 PM

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: fefc20de-6588-4918-87bf-294929acd98c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 12bbbdf and d03e691.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)

• gen/es/proto/splitsecure/bottle/v1/platform_data_pb.ts is excluded by !**/gen/**, !gen/**
• gen/go/proto/splitsecure/bottle/v1/platform_data.pb.go is excluded by !**/*.pb.go, !**/gen/**, !gen/**

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• proto/splitsecure/bottle/v1/platform_data.proto

📜 Recent review details

🔇 Additional comments (1)

proto/splitsecure/bottle/v1/platform_data.proto (1)

4-4: LGTM!

Also applies to: 41-44

---

Walkthrough

PlatformData now records the enclave-reported bottle sealing time with a protobuf timestamp, separate from audit observation timestamps.

Changes

PlatformData timestamp

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Add sealed_at timestamp proto/splitsecure/bottle/v1/platform_data.proto	Imports google/protobuf/timestamp.proto and adds the documented enclave-reported sealed_at timestamp field to PlatformData.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Suggested reviewers: marctrem

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the addition of the sealed time to bottle platform data.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description directly explains that the sealed_at field was added to bottle platform data for display.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@proto/splitsecure/bottle/v1/platform_data.proto`:
- Around line 42-44: Update the documentation comment for sealed_at to refer to
the repository-defined AuditObservationReceipt and replace “audit observation
staple” with “audit observation receipt,” preserving the rest of the guidance.

🪄 Autofix

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 2dbb7539-0c12-493a-8449-4318b6d921aa

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8d7f408 and b8f05e5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• proto/splitsecure/bottle/v1/platform_data.proto

📜 Review details

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (1)

• GitHub Check: Check Generated Code

🔇 Additional comments (1)

proto/splitsecure/bottle/v1/platform_data.proto (1)

4-4: LGTM!

[coderabbitai]

Note

GitHub couldn't provide a complete incremental comparison for this pull request, so CodeRabbit is performing a full review instead. This review may take a little longer.

[coderabbitai]

Note

GitHub couldn't provide a complete incremental comparison for this pull request, so CodeRabbit is performing a full review instead. This review may take a little longer.