Skip to content

Peer Review - Unclear Terminology on SCR 9 #185

@cyrussamante

Description

@cyrussamante

Artifact Under Review
Hazard Analysis - SCR 9

Team Number for Team Doing the Review
Team 03

Description of Issue
When you state:

"The system shall require user approval for high-impact refactorings or those with low confidence, providing visibility and oversight for critical changes."

It seems unclear when a refactoring is considered "high impact" or "low confidence". How would you be able to verify and validate that 100% of those classified refactorings have been caught? What metric are you utilizing for those factors?

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

hazard-analysisRelated to the Hazard Analysis (Deliverable 3)peer-reviewFeedback from peers

Type

No type

Projects

Status

Done

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions