Peer Review - Unclear Recommended Actions point

[calvynsiong]

Artifact Under Review
Hazard Analysis - section 5

Team Number for Team Doing the Review
Team 2

Description of Issue
Minor critique for the FMEA section, for the component "Reinforcement Learning" and the failure mode "bias in recommendations", the recommended actions "Regularly audit the model for bias" and "Ensure the training data is balanced across different types of refactorings and code patterns" is relatively vague. There's not much details regarding how the model can be audited or balanced to ensure there is less bias, thus it isn't quite verifiable. This is applicable to the "Recommended Actions" section of the rubric.

[Sevhena]

Added clarification to the recommended actions of hazard 13