Skip to content

Peer Review - Unclear Critical Assumptions #194

@markacruz

Description

@markacruz

Artifact Under Review

  • Critical Assumptions

Team Number for Team Doing the Review

  • Team 2

Description of Issue

  • It says "Testing Module is provided with automated tests that have enough coverage", but what exactly is enough coverage? It may be valuable to be specific (ie. the type of tests needed, especially for edge cases)
  • For "Code smells identified by the Refactoring Module always involve code that could be more energy
    efficient.", how will the module handle code smells that might improve readability or maintainability but don’t directly impact energy efficiency

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

hazard-analysisRelated to the Hazard Analysis (Deliverable 3)peer-reviewFeedback from peers

Type

No type

Projects

Status

Done

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions