Skip to content

Peer Review - Clearer acceptance criteria for maintainable and adaptable codebase #227

@calvynsiong

Description

@calvynsiong

Artifact Under Review
3.2.5

Team Number for Team Doing the Review

3

Description of Issue

I think the acceptance criteria could be more strictly defined, as adjectives like modular and maintainable can be a little subjective. Maybe following a specific code/style standard would help.

image

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

peer-reviewFeedback from peersvnv-planRelated to the VnV Plan (Deliverable 4)wontfixThis will not be worked on

Type

No type

Projects

Status

Done

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions