Skip to content

Peer Review - Inconsistent Fields Used for Requirements #238

@markacruz

Description

@markacruz

Artifact Under Review
VnV Plan

Team Number for Team Doing the Review
Team 03

Description of Issue
image

Some requirements uses the format from the slides (ie. Type, Initial State, etc.) and some are using a different one (ie. Objective, Scope, Methodology).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

peer-reviewFeedback from peersvnv-planRelated to the VnV Plan (Deliverable 4)

Type

No type

Projects

Status

Done

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions