-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
[Merged by Bors] - Refactored authentication handling #408
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a64a7f9
substantial rewrite of authentication.rs
1b1cbfd
cargo fmt
c38bfcc
cargo clippy
f67eb3d
~
bc18816
Bump toolchain
85df367
regenerate charts
ac9612d
LDAP test: change secret name to not match SecretClass
e3a156e
Updated changelog
46f158b
Update rust/operator-binary/src/controller.rs
fhennig 30e614d
refactor: use VolumeBuilder in 'build_keystore_volume'
4fccb57
cargo fmt
5592aab
Added comment about missing PodBuilder function
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
are there any changes in this PR that require rust 1.65? In the operator-templating changes that we did as preparation for the next release we stayed with 1.63, so it would be good to know if should move to 1.65 (and we should also change it in ubi8-rust-builder).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I talked to @sbernauer about this and he told me that we already moved to 1.65 in the framework. I'm not 100% sure but I think the new framework version has a new clap version that requires at least 1.64.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should come via templating and not be changed manually (it will fail to build if another templating PR is merged).
@adwk67 could we go for rust 1.65.0 or 1.66.1 in templating before the release?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, I suggest we go for 1.65. We can make that change before we roll out the templating changes across all operators on Thursday.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
operator-templating is already on 1.65 stackabletech/operator-templating@8d04aa2
This actually reduces the lag behind upstreaming templating.
IMHO go for it