-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
[Merged by Bors] - Use ephemeral secret-op volumes rather than csi #396
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Requires stackabletech/secret-operator#125, see that PR for motivation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
Edit: Is Ephemeral(Box<EphemeralVolumeSource>) in the enum really required? I mean we do not store 1000s of elements of that in a list. Whats against #[allow(clippy::enum_large_variants)] (not sure thats exactly how the lint is called)?
|
Yeah the main problem with |
Yeah but we do not really move that around or store a lot of elements in a list or sth. I think we can ignore the memory overhead for one item here? |
|
bors r+ |
## Description Requires stackabletech/secret-operator#125, see that PR for motivation Co-authored-by: Teo Klestrup Röijezon <teo.roijezon@stackable.de>
|
Pull request successfully merged into main. Build succeeded: |
Description
Requires stackabletech/secret-operator#125, see that PR for motivation
Review Checklist
Once the review is done, comment
bors r+(orbors merge) to merge. Further information